» Articles » PMID: 26417208

Advances in the Treatment of Syndromic Midface Hypoplasia Using Monobloc and Facial Bipartition Distraction Osteogenesis

Overview
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2015 Sep 30
PMID 26417208
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Midface hypoplasia or retrusion remains a persistent feature of syndromic craniosynostosis years after successful treatment of the cranium. Although expansion of the cranial vault in infancy by traditional fronto-orbital advancement, posterior expansion, or both, can treat the immediate intracranial constriction, midface hypoplasia and its stigmata of exorbitism, sleep apnea, central face concavity, and malocclusion remain suboptimally treated. Initial enthusiasm for the procedures was tempered due to a high rate of infectious complications; timing and indications for surgery continue to stir controversy. During the last decade renewed interest with the monobloc and facial bipartition procedure using distraction osteogenesis with either an internal or external distraction system has decreased morbidity significantly. These procedures have re-emerged as powerful and comprehensive tools in the treatment of syndromic midface hypoplasia.

Citing Articles

Crouzon Syndrome Spanning Three Generations: Advances in the Treatment of Syndromic Midface Deficiency.

Harmon K, Ferraro J, Rezania N, Carmona T, Figueroa A, Tragos C Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023; 11(11):e5296.

PMID: 38033876 PMC: 10684202. DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005296.


Midface Morphology and Growth in Syndromic Craniosynostosis Patients Following Frontofacial Monobloc Distraction.

Tonello C, Cevidanes L, Ruellas A, Alonso N J Craniofac Surg. 2020; 32(1):87-91.

PMID: 33136785 PMC: 8011493. DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000006997.

References
1.
Maercks R, Taylor J, Gordon C . Endoscopic monobloc advancement with ultrasonic osteotomy: a feasibility study. J Craniofac Surg. 2010; 21(2):479-82. DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181cfeca4. View

2.
Ortiz-Monasterio F, Del Campo A, Carrillo A . Advancement of the orbits and the midface in one piece, combined with frontal repositioning, for the correction of Crouzon's deformities. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1978; 61(4):507-16. DOI: 10.1097/00006534-197804000-00003. View

3.
Nout E, Bannink N, Koudstaal M, Veenland J, Joosten K, Poublon R . Upper airway changes in syndromic craniosynostosis patients following midface or monobloc advancement: correlation between volume changes and respiratory outcome. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2011; 40(3):209-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2011.04.017. View

4.
Wolfe S, Morrison G, Page L, Berkowitz S . The monobloc frontofacial advancement: do the pluses outweigh the minuses?. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993; 91(6):977-87; discussion 988-9. View

5.
Ahmad F, Cobb A, Mills C, Jones B, Hayward R, Dunaway D . Frontofacial monobloc distraction in the very young: a review of 12 consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012; 129(3):488e-497e. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182412820. View