» Articles » PMID: 38031095

Surgical Flip-dislocation of the Bicolumnar Approach Without Olecranon Osteotomy Versus Olecranon Osteotomy in Type AO 13C3 Distal Humeral Fracture: a Matched-cohort Study

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2023 Nov 29
PMID 38031095
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Our experience with the surgical flip-dislocation of the bicolumnar (SFDB) approach for type AO 13C3 humeral fractures indicates that this surgical approach can be performed safely and effectively in appropriately selected patients. We aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of the SFDB approach without olecranon osteotomy (OO) for type AO 13C3 distal humeral fractures.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 65 cases of type AO 13C3 distal humeral fractures treated between April 2008 and July 2018; 33 patients were treated with the SFDB approach, and the remaining were treated with OO. Propensity score matching was used to control for sex, age, and the American Society of Anesthesiology score. Elbow pain, range of motion, stability, and function were assessed using the Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire. Clinical complications, reoperation rates, and radiographic results were compared between the groups.

Results: Operative time and blood loss were significantly lower in the SFDB group than in the OO group (P = 0.001, P = 0.002, respectively). At the final follow-up, the mean postoperative MEPI did not significantly differ between the groups (P = 0.628). According to Morrey's criteria, a typical functional range of elbow motion was achieved in 12 and 15 patients in the SFDB and OO groups, respectively.

Conclusions: The SFDB approach achieves superior exposure of the articular surface without injury to the extensor mechanism in type 13C3 articular surface fracture treatment. This approach also results in good early functional recovery and clinical outcomes, with a low risk of complications.

References
1.
Sane A, Dakoure P, Dieme C, Kinkpe C, Dansokho A, Ndiaye A . [Olecranon osteotomy in the treatment of distal humeral fractures in adults: anatomical and functional evaluation of the elbow in 14 cases]. Chir Main. 2009; 28(2):93-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.main.2008.12.004. View

2.
Hudak P, Amadio P, Bombardier C . Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Am J Ind Med. 1996; 29(6):602-8. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199606)29:6<602::AID-AJIM4>3.0.CO;2-L. View

3.
Singh R, Kanodia N, Singh H . Outcome following olecranon osteotomy versus paratricipital approach for complex intra-articular (AO 13-C) fracture of distal humerus: a prospective comparative study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019; 28(4):742-750. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.01.002. View

4.
Muhldorfer-Fodor M, Bekler H, Wolfe V, McKean J, Rosenwasser M . Paratricipital-triceps splitting "two-window" approach for distal humerus fractures. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg. 2011; 15(3):156-61. DOI: 10.1097/BTH.0b013e318206f115. View

5.
Weber M, Cho E, Evans P, Styron J, Bafus B . Triceps tongue versus olecranon osteotomy for intra-articular distal humeral fractures: a matched-cohort study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022; 31(6):1215-1223. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.01.128. View