» Articles » PMID: 24332475

Wound Complications After Distal Humerus Fracture Fixation: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Outcome

Overview
Date 2013 Dec 17
PMID 24332475
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: This study set out to accurately determine the incidence of wound complications after distal humerus fracture fixation, to assess risk factors, and to determine their implications on outcome.

Methods: Eighty-nine distal humerus fractures (mean patient age, 58 years) were treated with internal fixation at an average of 4 days after injury. Mean follow-up time was 15 months (range, 6-72 months). Twenty-nine (33%) fractures were open. Medical records and radiographs were reviewed to determine wound complications. Logistic regression analysis was carried out to determine associated risk factors.

Results: Fourteen patients (15.7%) developed a major wound complication requiring on average 2.5 (range, 1-6) additional surgical procedures. Six patients required plastic surgical soft tissue coverage. All 14 fractures complicated by wound problems united. The final mean range of motion in the major wound complication group was 100° (range, 65°-130°), compared with 100° (range, 10°-140°) in those with no or minor wound problems. Grade III open fractures and the use of a plate to stabilize the olecranon osteotomy were identified as significant risk factors for development of major wound complications.

Conclusions: The incidence of major wound complications after fixation of distal humerus fractures is substantial. The presence of a grade III open fracture and the use of an olecranon osteotomy stabilized with a plate are significant risk factors for major wound complications. Fracture healing rates and functional elbow range of motion do not appear to be affected by major wound complications when they are handled with proper soft tissue coverage techniques.

Citing Articles

A systematic review of the treatment of distal humerus fractures in older adults: A comparison of surgical and non-surgical options.

Stoddart M, Panagopoulos G, Craig R, Falworth M, Butt D, Rudge W Shoulder Elbow. 2024; 16(2):175-185.

PMID: 38655404 PMC: 11034469. DOI: 10.1177/17585732221099845.


Clinical outcomes of olecranon sled fixation in patients with Mayo type II olecranon fractures.

Chen C, Zhang J, Cao R, Hua K, Zha Y, Gong M Heliyon. 2024; 10(8):e29184.

PMID: 38628716 PMC: 11019171. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29184.


Analysis of the associated factors in postoperative wound infection following open reduction and internal fixation for elbow fracture.

Cui C, Ma L, Qi X Int Wound J. 2024; 21(4):e14825.

PMID: 38613419 PMC: 11015467. DOI: 10.1111/iwj.14825.


Surgical flip-dislocation of the bicolumnar approach without olecranon osteotomy versus olecranon osteotomy in type AO 13C3 distal humeral fracture: a matched-cohort study.

Zhou S, Jin S, Wang Q, Ren G, Peng C, Wang Y J Orthop Surg Res. 2023; 18(1):913.

PMID: 38031095 PMC: 10688126. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-023-04405-0.


Efficacy and safety of anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve for distal humerus fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Li T, Yan J, Ren Q, Hu J, Wang F, Xiao C Front Surg. 2023; 9:1005200.

PMID: 36684340 PMC: 9853443. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1005200.