» Articles » PMID: 38018694

Evaluating Signaling Bias for Synthetic Cannabinoid Receptor Agonists at the Cannabinoid CB Receptor

Overview
Date 2023 Nov 29
PMID 38018694
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The rapid structural evolution and emergence of novel synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists (SCRAs) in the recreational market remains a key public health concern. Despite representing one of the largest classes of new psychoactive substances, pharmacological data on new SCRAs is limited, particularly at the cannabinoid CB receptor (CB ). Hence, the current study aimed to characterize the molecular pharmacology of a structurally diverse panel of SCRAs at CB , including 4-cyano MPP-BUT7AICA, 4F-MDMB-BUTINACA, AMB-FUBINACA, JWH-018, MDMB-4en-PINACA, and XLR-11. The activity of SCRAs was assessed in a battery of in vitro assays in CB -expressing HEK 293 cells: G protein activation (Gα and Gα ), phosphorylation of ERK1/2, and β-arrestin 1/2 translocation. The activity profiles of the ligands were further evaluated using the operational analysis to identify ligand bias. All SCRAs activated the CB signaling pathways in a concentration-dependent manner, although with varying potencies and efficacies. Despite the detection of numerous instances of statistically significant bias, compound activities generally appeared only subtly distinct in comparison with the reference ligand, CP55940. In contrast, the phytocannabinoid THC exhibited an activity profile distinct from the SCRAs; most notably in the translocation of β-arrestins. These findings demonstrate that CB is able to accommodate a structurally diverse array of SCRAs to generate canonical agonist activity. Further research is required to elucidate whether the activation of CB contributes to the toxicity of these compounds.

Citing Articles

Pharmacological evaluation of new generation OXIZID synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists.

Patel M, Zheng X, Akinfiresoye L, Prioleau C, Walker T, Glass M Eur J Pharmacol. 2024; 971:176549.

PMID: 38561104 PMC: 11132922. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2024.176549.


Evaluating signaling bias for synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists at the cannabinoid CB receptor.

Patel M, Grimsey N, Banister S, Finlay D, Glass M Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2023; 11(6):e01157.

PMID: 38018694 PMC: 10685394. DOI: 10.1002/prp2.1157.

References
1.
Marusich J, Gamage T, Zhang Y, Akinfiresoye L, Wiley J . In vitro and in vivo pharmacology of nine novel synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2022; 220:173467. PMC: 9837865. DOI: 10.1016/j.pbb.2022.173467. View

2.
Banister S, Moir M, Stuart J, Kevin R, Wood K, Longworth M . Pharmacology of Indole and Indazole Synthetic Cannabinoid Designer Drugs AB-FUBINACA, ADB-FUBINACA, AB-PINACA, ADB-PINACA, 5F-AB-PINACA, 5F-ADB-PINACA, ADBICA, and 5F-ADBICA. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2015; 6(9):1546-59. DOI: 10.1021/acschemneuro.5b00112. View

3.
Longworth M, Banister S, Boyd R, Kevin R, Connor M, McGregor I . Pharmacology of Cumyl-Carboxamide Synthetic Cannabinoid New Psychoactive Substances (NPS) CUMYL-BICA, CUMYL-PICA, CUMYL-5F-PICA, CUMYL-5F-PINACA, and Their Analogues. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2017; 8(10):2159-2167. DOI: 10.1021/acschemneuro.7b00267. View

4.
Olsen R, DiBerto J, English J, Glaudin A, Krumm B, Slocum S . TRUPATH, an open-source biosensor platform for interrogating the GPCR transducerome. Nat Chem Biol. 2020; 16(8):841-849. PMC: 7648517. DOI: 10.1038/s41589-020-0535-8. View

5.
Banister S, Stuart J, Kevin R, Edington A, Longworth M, Wilkinson S . Effects of bioisosteric fluorine in synthetic cannabinoid designer drugs JWH-018, AM-2201, UR-144, XLR-11, PB-22, 5F-PB-22, APICA, and STS-135. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2015; 6(8):1445-58. DOI: 10.1021/acschemneuro.5b00107. View