» Articles » PMID: 38001154

An Explainable Machine Learning-based Phenomapping Strategy for Adaptive Predictive Enrichment in Randomized Clinical Trials

Overview
Journal NPJ Digit Med
Date 2023 Nov 24
PMID 38001154
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Randomized clinical trials (RCT) represent the cornerstone of evidence-based medicine but are resource-intensive. We propose and evaluate a machine learning (ML) strategy of adaptive predictive enrichment through computational trial phenomaps to optimize RCT enrollment. In simulated group sequential analyses of two large cardiovascular outcomes RCTs of (1) a therapeutic drug (pioglitazone versus placebo; Insulin Resistance Intervention after Stroke (IRIS) trial), and (2) a disease management strategy (intensive versus standard systolic blood pressure reduction in the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT)), we constructed dynamic phenotypic representations to infer response profiles during interim analyses and examined their association with study outcomes. Across three interim timepoints, our strategy learned dynamic phenotypic signatures predictive of individualized cardiovascular benefit. By conditioning a prospective candidate's probability of enrollment on their predicted benefit, we estimate that our approach would have enabled a reduction in the final trial size across ten simulations (IRIS: -14.8% ± 3.1%, p = 0.001; SPRINT: -17.6% ± 3.6%, p < 0.001), while preserving the original average treatment effect (IRIS: hazard ratio of 0.73 ± 0.01 for pioglitazone vs placebo, vs 0.76 in the original trial; SPRINT: hazard ratio of 0.72 ± 0.01 for intensive vs standard systolic blood pressure, vs 0.75 in the original trial; all simulations with Cox regression-derived p value of  < 0.01 for the effect of the intervention on the respective primary outcome). This adaptive framework has the potential to maximize RCT enrollment efficiency.

Citing Articles

Cardiovascular care with digital twin technology in the era of generative artificial intelligence.

Thangaraj P, Benson S, Oikonomou E, Asselbergs F, Khera R Eur Heart J. 2024; .

PMID: 39322420 PMC: 11638093. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae619.


Measures to Improve Trial Enrollment: It's Game Time!.

Reza N, Fiuzat M, Konstam M JACC Heart Fail. 2024; 12(11):1942-1945.

PMID: 39269394 PMC: 11540738. DOI: 10.1016/j.jchf.2024.08.006.


Clinical trial design, end-points, and emerging therapies in pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Weatherald J, Fleming T, Wilkins M, Cascino T, Psotka M, Zamanian R Eur Respir J. 2024; 64(4).

PMID: 39209468 PMC: 11525337. DOI: 10.1183/13993003.01205-2024.


The Introduction of AI Into Decentralized Clinical Trials: Preparing for a Paradigm Shift.

Goldberg J, Amin N, Zachariah K, Bhatt A JACC Adv. 2024; 3(8):101094.

PMID: 39070092 PMC: 11277430. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.101094.


Artificial intelligence-enhanced patient evaluation: bridging art and science.

Oikonomou E, Khera R Eur Heart J. 2024; 45(35):3204-3218.

PMID: 38976371 PMC: 11400875. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae415.


References
1.
Keene O, Lynggaard H, Englert S, Lanius V, Wright D . Why estimands are needed to define treatment effects in clinical trials. BMC Med. 2023; 21(1):276. PMC: 10375689. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-023-02969-6. View

2.
Moore T, Heyward J, Anderson G, Alexander G . Variation in the estimated costs of pivotal clinical benefit trials supporting the US approval of new therapeutic agents, 2015-2017: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2020; 10(6):e038863. PMC: 7295430. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038863. View

3.
Lazzareschi D, Mehta R, Dember L, Bernholz J, Turan A, Sharma A . Overcoming barriers in the design and implementation of clinical trials for acute kidney injury: a report from the 2020 Kidney Disease Clinical Trialists meeting. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2022; 38(4):834-844. PMC: 10064977. DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfac003. View

4.
Cainzos-Achirica M, Anugula D, Mszar R, Grandhi G, Patel K, Bittencourt M . Rationale and pathways forward in the implementation of coronary artery calcium-based enrichment of randomized trials. Am Heart J. 2021; 243:54-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2021.09.006. View

5.
Oikonomou E, Spatz E, Suchard M, Khera R . Individualising intensive systolic blood pressure reduction in hypertension using computational trial phenomaps and machine learning: a post-hoc analysis of randomised clinical trials. Lancet Digit Health. 2022; 4(11):e796-e805. PMC: 9768739. DOI: 10.1016/S2589-7500(22)00170-4. View