» Articles » PMID: 37998455

Incidence and Risk Factors for Wound Revision After Surgical Treatment of Spinal Metastasis: A National Population-Based Study in South Korea

Overview
Specialty Health Services
Date 2023 Nov 24
PMID 37998455
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Wound complications are commonly seen after surgeries for metastatic spine tumors. While numerous studies have pinpointed various risk factors, there is ongoing debate. Therefore, this study aimed to verify various factors that are still under debate utilizing the comprehensive Korean National Health Insurance Service database. We identified and retrospectively reviewed a cohort of 3001 patients who underwent one of five surgical treatments (corpectomy, decompression and instrumentation, instrumentation only, decompression only, and vertebroplasty) for newly diagnosed spinal metastasis between 2009 and 2017. A Cox regression analysis was performed to determine the risk factors. A total of 197 cases (6.6%) of wound revision were found. Only the surgical method and Charlson comorbidity index were significantly different between the group that underwent wound revision and the group that did not. Regarding surgical methods, the adjusted hazard ratios for decompression only, corpectomy, instrumentation and decompression, and instrumentation only were 1.3, 2.2, 2.2, and 2.4, with these ratios being compared to the vertebroplasty group ( for trend = 0.02). In this regard, based on a sizable South Korean cohort, both surgical methods and medical comorbidity were found to be associated with the wound revision rate among spinal surgery patients for spinal metastasis.

Citing Articles

Determinants of Overall and Readmission-Free Survival in Patients with Metastatic Epidural Spinal Cord Compression.

Pojskic M, Sass B, Bopp M, Wilke S, Nimsky C Cancers (Basel). 2025; 16(24.

PMID: 39766146 PMC: 11674039. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16244248.


Complication avoidance, rehabilitation, pain therapy and palliative care for patients with metastatic spine tumors: WFNS spine committee recommendations.

Pojskic M, Naderi S, Vaishya S, Zileli M, Costa F, Sharif S Neurosurg Rev. 2024; 47(1):830.

PMID: 39476270 PMC: 11525440. DOI: 10.1007/s10143-024-03050-3.

References
1.
Jarvers J, Lange M, Schiemann S, Pfranger J, Heyde C, Osterhoff G . Risk factors for wound-related complications after surgical stabilization of spinal metastases with a special focus on the effect of postoperative radiation therapy. BMC Surg. 2021; 21(1):423. PMC: 8684154. DOI: 10.1186/s12893-021-01431-9. View

2.
Alfonso Olmos M, Gonzalez A, Clemente J, Villas Tome C . Infected vertebroplasty due to uncommon bacteria solved surgically: a rare and threatening life complication of a common procedure: report of a case and a review of the literature. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006; 31(20):E770-3. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000240202.91336.99. View

3.
Choi S, Koo J, Choe D, Kang C . The Incidence and Management Trends of Metastatic Spinal Tumors in South Korea: A Nationwide Population-based Study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020; 45(14):E856-E863. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003445. View

4.
Haubner F, Ohmann E, Pohl F, Strutz J, Gassner H . Wound healing after radiation therapy: review of the literature. Radiat Oncol. 2012; 7:162. PMC: 3504517. DOI: 10.1186/1748-717X-7-162. View

5.
Lee B, Franklin I, Lewis J, Coombes R, Leonard R, Gishen P . The efficacy of percutaneous vertebroplasty for vertebral metastases associated with solid malignancies. Eur J Cancer. 2009; 45(9):1597-602. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2009.01.021. View