» Articles » PMID: 29547061

Risk Factors for Wound-related Reoperations in Patients with Metastatic Spine Tumor

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Resection of metastatic spine tumors can improve patients' quality of life by addressing pain or neurological compromise. However, resections are often complicated by wound dehiscence, infection, instrumentation failures, and the need for reoperation. Moreover, when reoperations are needed, the most common indication is surgical site infection and wound breakdown. In turn, wound reoperations increase morbidity as well as the length and cost of hospitalization. The aim of this study was to examine perioperative risk factors associated with increased rate of wound reoperations after metastatic spine tumor resection. METHODS A retrospective study of patients at a single institution who underwent metastatic spine tumor resection between 2003 and 2013 was conducted. Factors with a p value < 0.200 in a univariate analysis were included in the multivariate model. RESULTS A total of 159 patients were included in this study. Karnofsky Performance Scale score > 70, smoking status, hypertension, thromboembolic events, hyperlipidemia, increasing number of vertebral levels, and posterior approach were included in the multivariate analysis. Thromboembolic events (95% CI 1.19-48.5, p = 0.032) and number of levels involved were independently associated with increased wound reoperation rates in the multivariate model. For each additional spinal level involved, the risk for wound reoperations increased by 21% (95% CI 1.03-1.43, p = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS Although wound complications and subsequent reoperations are potential risks for all patients with metastatic spine tumor, due to adjuvant radiotherapy and other medical comorbidities, this study identified patients with thromboembolic events or those requiring a larger incision as being at the highest risk. Measures intended to decrease the occurrence of perioperative venous thromboembolism and to improve wound care, especially for long incisions, may decrease wound-related revision surgeries in this vulnerable group of patients.

Citing Articles

Overview of Molecular Prognostication for Common Solid Tumor Histologies - What the Surgeon Should Know.

Goodwin C, De La Garza Ramos R, Bettegowda C, Barzilai O, Shreyaskumar P, Fehlings M Global Spine J. 2025; 15(1_suppl):6S-15S.

PMID: 39801124 PMC: 11726510. DOI: 10.1177/21925682241250327.


Intraoperative radiotherapy combined with spinal stabilization surgery-a novel treatment strategy for spinal metastases based on a first single-center experiences.

Krauss P, Wolfert C, Sommer B, Stemmer B, Stueben G, Kahl K J Neurooncol. 2024; 168(3):445-455.

PMID: 38652400 PMC: 11186943. DOI: 10.1007/s11060-024-04688-1.


Development and validation of a point-of-care clinical risk score to predict surgical site complication-associated readmissions following open spine surgery.

Mueller K, Hou Y, Beach K, Griffin L J Spine Surg. 2024; 10(1):40-54.

PMID: 38567014 PMC: 10982919. DOI: 10.21037/jss-23-89.


Incidence and Risk Factors for Wound Revision after Surgical Treatment of Spinal Metastasis: A National Population-Based Study in South Korea.

Lee H, Jang H, Park J, Chung N, Chung H, Jun J Healthcare (Basel). 2023; 11(22).

PMID: 37998455 PMC: 10671392. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11222962.


Artificial Intelligence and Predictive Modeling in Spinal Oncology: A Narrative Review.

Kuijten R, Zijlstra H, Groot O, Schwab J Int J Spine Surg. 2023; 17(S1):S45-S56.

PMID: 37164481 PMC: 10318913. DOI: 10.14444/8500.