The "cut and Push" Method of Removing Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube is Not Safe in Paediatric Patients

Overview

Journal Pediatr Surg Int

Specialties General Surgery
Pediatrics

Date 2023 Nov 22

PMID 37993741

Authors

Nasib Alchoikani

Collette Donnelly

Suzanne Lawther

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: A "cut and push" (CP) approach has been described in the literature for removal of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes. The aim of this study is to investigate the safety profile of this method in children.

Method: Our study included all children who underwent CP procedure for either removal or replacement of Freka PEG tube at our centre between January 2016 and August 2021. Parents contacted to establish if the internal component had been seen in the stools post-procedure. If not seen, a plain film of chest, abdomen and pelvis was arranged followed by computerised tomography (CT) scan. The presence of the internal component as a retained foreign body on imaging was evaluated along with any complication.

Results: Of the 27 patients included, six (22.2%) patients had the internal component seen in the stool. Five (18.5%) patients in total had a retained internal component with three (11.1%) patients had major complications requiring complex surgical interventions, and two (7.4%) patients required endoscopic retrieval.

Conclusion: Our study reports more severe complications that required complex surgical interventions compared to the previous studies. We believe that this method of removal is not safe in children and should be abandoned. Also, patients with Down syndrome might be at higher risk of retention and complications.

References

Gauderer M, Ponsky J, IZANT Jr R . Gastrostomy without laparotomy: a percutaneous endoscopic technique. J Pediatr Surg. 1980; 15(6):872-5. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3468(80)80296-x. View

Avitsland T, Kristensen C, Emblem R, Veenstra M, Mala T, Bjornland K . Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in children: a safe technique with major symptom relief and high parental satisfaction. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2006; 43(5):624-8. DOI: 10.1097/01.mpg.0000229550.54455.63. View

Palmer G, Frawley G, Heine R, Oliver M . Complications associated with endoscopic removal of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes in children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2006; 42(4):443-5. DOI: 10.1097/01.mpg.0000189361.61298.9f. View

Thomas H, Yole J, Livingston M, Bailey K, Cameron B, VanHouwelingen L . Replacing gastrostomy tubes with collapsible bumpers in pediatric patients: Is it safe to "cut" the tube and allow the bumper to pass enterally?. J Pediatr Surg. 2018; 53(5):942-945. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.02.020. View

Srinivasan R, Irvine T, Dalzell A . Traction removal of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy devices in children. Dig Dis Sci. 2009; 55(10):2874-7. DOI: 10.1007/s10620-009-1090-z. View

Korula J, Harma C . A simple and inexpensive method of removal or replacement of gastrostomy tubes. JAMA. 1991; 265(11):1426-8. View

Merrick S, Harnden S, Shetty S, Chopra P, Clamp P, Kapadia S . An evaluation of the "cut and push" method of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) removal. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2008; 32(1):78-80. DOI: 10.1177/014860710803200178. View

Pearce C, Goggin P, Collett J, Smith L, Duncan H . The 'cut and push' method of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube removal. Clin Nutr. 2000; 19(2):133-5. DOI: 10.1054/clnu.2000.0100. View

Kejariwal D, Bromley D, Miao Y . The "cut and push" method of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube removal in adult patients: the Ipswich experience. Nutr Clin Pract. 2009; 24(2):281-3. DOI: 10.1177/0884533608323420. View

10.

Agha A, Alsaudi D, Furnari M, Abdulhadi Ali M, Morched Chakik R, Alsaudi I . Feasibility of the cut-and-push method for removing large-caliber soft percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy devices. Nutr Clin Pract. 2013; 28(4):490-2. DOI: 10.1177/0884533613486933. View

11.

Pratt J, Green S . Removal of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes in adults using the "cut and push" method: A systematic review. Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2018; 21:59-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2017.05.004. View

12.

Mollitt D, Dokler M, Evans J, Jeiven S, George D . Complications of retained internal bolster after pediatric percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. J Pediatr Surg. 1998; 33(2):271-3. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3468(98)90445-6. View

13.

Yaseen M, Steele M, Grunow J . Nonendoscopic removal of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes: morbidity and mortality in children. Gastrointest Endosc. 1996; 44(3):235-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(96)70157-8. View

14.

Claxton H, Dick K, Taylor R, Allam M, Stedman F, Keys C . 'Cut and push' as an alternative to endoscopic retrieval of PEG type gastrostomy tubes. Pediatr Surg Int. 2023; 39(1):94. PMC: 9885393. DOI: 10.1007/s00383-023-05382-5. View