» Articles » PMID: 17130739

Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy in Children: a Safe Technique with Major Symptom Relief and High Parental Satisfaction

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Date 2006 Nov 30
PMID 17130739
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is widely used for establishing enteral feeding. The aim of this study was to assess immediate and long-term results after PEG insertion.

Patients And Methods: A total of 121 children were retrospectively reviewed. Median age was 2.4 years (range, 4 months-13.2 years) at the time of PEG insertion. Patient morbidity, indications for PEG, preoperative findings and perioperative complications were registered retrospectively. Parents/caregivers of 85 children were interviewed for long-term results.

Results: Perioperative complications were seen in 12%. Twenty-four percent died at a median of 15 months (range, 1.5 months-8 years) after PEG. Eighty-five families were interviewed with a median follow-up time of 5.6 years (range, 1-10 years). A substantial majority (94%) of parents/caregivers reported that the PEG had a positive influence on their child's situation, and 98% would have chosen PEG insertion again. Vomiting/retching improved in 61% of the children, and oral intake enhanced in 43%. Stoma-related complications were frequent (73%). The gastrostomy tube was permanently removed at a median of 3 years (range, 7 months-7.3 years) after PEG placement in 25%. Delayed closure of the gastrocutaneous fistula after gastrostomy removal occurred in 48% of them. Time from insertion to removal was not predictive of delayed closure.

Conclusion: PEG is a safe technique for establishing enteral feeding, even in very sick children. Major complications are rare, although most children experience minor stoma-related problems. Parents/caregivers report that the gastrostomy is of great help for themselves and their child.

Citing Articles

Gastrostomy tube feeding in children: a single-center experience.

Pagliaro M, Tran V, Schoepfer A, Nydegger A BMC Gastroenterol. 2025; 25(1):12.

PMID: 39794725 PMC: 11720959. DOI: 10.1186/s12876-024-03582-4.


Pediatric Craniofacial Tumor Reconstruction.

Parham M, Ding Y, Wang D, Jiang A, Buchanan E Semin Plast Surg. 2023; 37(4):265-274.

PMID: 38098683 PMC: 10718654. DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1776330.


The "cut and push" method of removing percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube is not safe in paediatric patients.

Alchoikani N, Donnelly C, Lawther S Pediatr Surg Int. 2023; 40(1):4.

PMID: 37993741 DOI: 10.1007/s00383-023-05575-y.


Advances and challenges of gastrostomy insertion in children.

Bitar R, Azaz A, Rawat D, Hobeldin M, Miqdady M, Abdelsalam S World J Gastrointest Surg. 2023; 15(9):1871-1878.

PMID: 37901743 PMC: 10600771. DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i9.1871.


The Community Cost of Maintaining Gastrostomies in Pediatric Patients.

Makker J, Pardy C, Kelly V, Yardley I JPGN Rep. 2023; 4(1):e278.

PMID: 37181922 PMC: 10174736. DOI: 10.1097/PG9.0000000000000278.