» Articles » PMID: 37986973

Measures of Fragmentation of Rest Activity Patterns: Mathematical Properties and Interpretability Based on Accelerometer Real Life Data

Overview
Journal Res Sq
Date 2023 Nov 21
PMID 37986973
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Accelerometers, devices that measure body movements, have become valuable tools for studying the fragmentation of rest-activity patterns, a core circadian rhythm dimension, using metrics such as inter-daily stability (IS), intradaily variability (IV), transition probability (TP), and self-similarity parameter (named ). However, their use remains mainly empirical. Therefore, we investigated the mathematical properties and interpretability of rest-activity fragmentation metrics by providing mathematical proofs for the ranges of IS and IV, proposing maximum likelihood and Bayesian estimators for TP, introducing the activity balance index metric, an adaptation of , and describing distributions of these metrics in real-life setting. Analysis of accelerometer data from 2,859 individuals (age=60-83 years, 21.1% women) from the Whitehall II cohort (UK) shows modest correlations between the metrics, except for ABI and . Sociodemographic (age, sex, education, employment status) and clinical (body mass index (BMI), and number of morbidities) factors were associated with these metrics, with differences observed according to metrics. For example, a difference of 5 units in BMI was associated with all metrics (differences ranging between -0.261 (95% CI -0.302, -0.220) to 0.228 (0.18, 0.268) for standardised TP rest to activity during the awake period and TP activity to rest during the awake period, respectively). These results reinforce the value of these rest-activity fragmentation metrics in epidemiological and clinical studies to examine their role for health. This paper expands on a set of methods that have previously demonstrated empirical value, improves the theoretical foundation for these methods, and evaluates their empirical worth in a large dataset.

References
1.
Di J, Spira A, Bai J, Urbanek J, Leroux A, Wu M . Joint and Individual Representation of Domains of Physical Activity, Sleep, and Circadian Rhythmicity. Stat Biosci. 2020; 11(2):371-402. PMC: 7241438. DOI: 10.1007/s12561-019-09236-4. View

2.
van Hees V, Gorzelniak L, Dean Leon E, Eder M, Pias M, Taherian S . Separating movement and gravity components in an acceleration signal and implications for the assessment of human daily physical activity. PLoS One. 2013; 8(4):e61691. PMC: 3634007. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061691. View

3.
Hou Y, Liu L, Chen X, Li Q, Li J . Association between circadian disruption and diseases: A narrative review. Life Sci. 2020; 262:118512. DOI: 10.1016/j.lfs.2020.118512. View

4.
Liguori C, Mombelli S, Fernandes M, Zucconi M, Plazzi G, Ferini-Strambi L . The evolving role of quantitative actigraphy in clinical sleep medicine. Sleep Med Rev. 2023; 68:101762. DOI: 10.1016/j.smrv.2023.101762. View

5.
Mesquita V, Oliveira Filho F, Rodrigues P . Detection of crossover points in detrended fluctuation analysis: an application to EEG signals of patients with epilepsy. Bioinformatics. 2021; 37(9):1278-1284. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa955. View