» Articles » PMID: 37970736

Human Monoclonal Antibody F61 Nasal Spray Effectively Protected High-risk Populations from SARS-CoV-2 Variants During the COVID-19 Pandemic from Late 2022 to Early 2023 in China

Abstract

Following the national dynamic zero-COVID strategy adjustment, the utilization of broad-spectrum nasal neutralizing antibodies may offer an alternative approach to controlling the outbreak of Omicron variants between late 2022 and early 2023 in China. This study involved an investigator-initiated trial (IIT) to assess the pharmacokinetic, safety and efficacy of the F61 nasal spray. A total of 2,008 participants were randomly assigned to receive F61 nasal spray (24 mg/0.8 mL/dose) or normal saline (0.8 mL/dose) and 1336 completed the follow-up in the IIT. Minimal absorption of F61 antibody into the bloodstream was detected in individuals receiving F61 nasal spray for seven consecutive days. No treatment-emergent adverse reactions of grade 3 severity or higher were reported. In the one-dose cohort, the 7-day cumulative SARS-CoV-2 infection rate was 79.0% in the F61 group and 82.6% in the placebo group, whereas, in the multiple-dose (once daily for 7 consecutive days) cohort, the rates were 6.55% in the F61 group and 23.83% in the placebo group. The laboratory-confirmed efficacy of F61 was 3.78% (-3.74%-10.75%) in the one-dose cohort and 72.19% (57.33%-81.87%) in the multiple-dose cohort. In the real-world study, 60,225 volunteers in four different regions were administered the F61 nasal spray based on the subject's wishes, over 90% efficacy rate was observed against different Omicron variants. The F61 nasal spray, with its favourable safety profile, could be a promising prophylactic monoclonal antibody against SARS-CoV-2 VOCs.

References
1.
Prince G, Hemming V, Horswood R, Baron P, Chanock R . Effectiveness of topically administered neutralizing antibodies in experimental immunotherapy of respiratory syncytial virus infection in cotton rats. J Virol. 1987; 61(6):1851-4. PMC: 254189. DOI: 10.1128/JVI.61.6.1851-1854.1987. View

2.
Totschnig D, Augustin M, Niculescu I, Laferl H, Jansen-Skoupy S, Lehmann C . SARS-CoV-2 Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis with Sotrovimab and Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab in Immunocompromised Patients-A Single-Center Experience. Viruses. 2022; 14(10). PMC: 9607212. DOI: 10.3390/v14102278. View

3.
Zhang Z, Li H, Ma H, Wang W, Gao D, Ye F . Genomic Recombination of SARS-CoV-2 Subvariants BA.5.2.48 and BF.7.14 - China, 2023. China CDC Wkly. 2023; 5(14):318-320. PMC: 10182904. DOI: 10.46234/ccdcw2023.058. View

4.
Yang M, Li J, Huang Z, Li H, Wang Y, Wang X . Structural Basis of a Human Neutralizing Antibody Specific to the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Receptor-Binding Domain. Microbiol Spectr. 2021; 9(2):e0135221. PMC: 8515945. DOI: 10.1128/Spectrum.01352-21. View

5.
Song R, Zeng G, Yu J, Meng X, Chen X, Li J . Post-exposure prophylaxis with SA58 (anti-SARS-COV-2 monoclonal antibody) nasal spray for the prevention of symptomatic COVID-19 in healthy adult workers: a randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled clinical study. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2023; 12(1):2212806. PMC: 10215016. DOI: 10.1080/22221751.2023.2212806. View