Neural Responses to Acute Stress Predict Chronic Stress Perception in Daily Life over 13 Months

Overview

Journal Sci Rep

Specialty Science

Date 2023 Nov 15

PMID 37968323

Authors

Marina Giglberger

Hannah L Peter

Gina-Isabelle Henze

Elisabeth Kraus

Christoph Bartl

Julian Konzok

Ludwig Kreuzpointner

Peter Kirsch

Brigitte M Kudielka

Stefan Wust

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The importance of amygdala, hippocampus, and medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) for the integration of neural, endocrine, and affective stress processing was shown in healthy participants and patients with stress-related disorders. The present manuscript which reports on one study-arm of the LawSTRESS project, aimed at investigating the predictive value of acute stress responses in these regions for biopsychological consequences of chronic stress in daily life. The LawSTRESS project examined law students either in preparation for their first state examination (stress group [SG]) or in the mid-phase of their study program (control group [CG]) over 13 months. Ambulatory assessments comprising perceived stress measurements and the cortisol awakening response (CAR) were administered on six sampling points (t1 = - 1 year, t2 = - 3 months, t3 = - 1 week, t4 = exam, t5 = + 1 week, t6 = + 1 month). In a subsample of 124 participants (SG: 61; CG: 63), ScanSTRESS was applied at baseline. In the SG but not in the CG, amygdala, hippocampus, and (post-hoc analyzed) right mPFC activation changes during ScanSTRESS were significantly associated with the trajectory of perceived stress but not with the CAR. Consistent with our finding in the total LawSTRESS sample, a significant increase in perceived stress and a blunted CAR over time could be detected in the SG only. Our findings suggest that more pronounced activation decreases of amygdala, hippocampus, and mPFC in response to acute psychosocial stress at baseline were related to a more pronounced increase of stress in daily life over the following year.

Citing Articles

Associations Between the Neural Stress Response and Symptoms of Anxiety and Depression.

Giglberger M, Peter H, Henze G, Bartl C, Konzok J, Kirsch P J Neurosci Res. 2025; 103(1):e70019.

PMID: 39817876 PMC: 11737356. DOI: 10.1002/jnr.70019.

References

Bouma E, Riese H, Ormel J, Verhulst F, Oldehinkel A . Adolescents' cortisol responses to awakening and social stress; effects of gender, menstrual phase and oral contraceptives. The TRAILS study. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2009; 34(6):884-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2009.01.003. View

den Braber A, Bohlken M, Brouwer R, van t Ent D, Kanai R, Kahn R . Heritability of subcortical brain measures: a perspective for future genome-wide association studies. Neuroimage. 2013; 83:98-102. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.06.027. View

Ulrich-Lai Y, Herman J . Neural regulation of endocrine and autonomic stress responses. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009; 10(6):397-409. PMC: 4240627. DOI: 10.1038/nrn2647. View

Khalili-Mahani N, Dedovic K, Engert V, Pruessner M, Pruessner J . Hippocampal activation during a cognitive task is associated with subsequent neuroendocrine and cognitive responses to psychological stress. Hippocampus. 2009; 20(2):323-34. DOI: 10.1002/hipo.20623. View

Urry H, van Reekum C, Johnstone T, Kalin N, Thurow M, Schaefer H . Amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex are inversely coupled during regulation of negative affect and predict the diurnal pattern of cortisol secretion among older adults. J Neurosci. 2006; 26(16):4415-25. PMC: 6673990. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3215-05.2006. View

Woolrich M, Behrens T, Beckmann C, Jenkinson M, Smith S . Multilevel linear modelling for FMRI group analysis using Bayesian inference. Neuroimage. 2004; 21(4):1732-47. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.12.023. View

Orem T, Wheelock M, Goodman A, Harnett N, Wood K, Gossett E . Amygdala and prefrontal cortex activity varies with individual differences in the emotional response to psychosocial stress. Behav Neurosci. 2019; 133(2):203-211. PMC: 6435298. DOI: 10.1037/bne0000305. View

Jansari A, Rodway P, Goncalves S . Identifying facial emotions: valence specific effects and an exploration of the effects of viewer gender. Brain Cogn. 2011; 76(3):415-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2011.03.009. View

Dong D, Ironside M, Belleau E, Sun X, Cheng C, Xiong G . Sex-specific neural responses to acute psychosocial stress in depression. Transl Psychiatry. 2022; 12(1):2. PMC: 8748634. DOI: 10.1038/s41398-021-01768-y. View

10.

Wolfram M, Bellingrath S, Kudielka B . The cortisol awakening response (CAR) across the female menstrual cycle. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2011; 36(6):905-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2010.12.006. View

11.

Jiang N, Xu J, Li X, Wang Y, Zhuang L, Qin S . Negative Parenting Affects Adolescent Internalizing Symptoms Through Alterations in Amygdala-Prefrontal Circuitry: A Longitudinal Twin Study. Biol Psychiatry. 2020; 89(6):560-569. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2020.08.002. View

12.

Law R, Clow A . Stress, the cortisol awakening response and cognitive function. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2020; 150:187-217. DOI: 10.1016/bs.irn.2020.01.001. View

13.

van Oort J, Tendolkar I, Hermans E, Mulders P, Beckmann C, Schene A . How the brain connects in response to acute stress: A review at the human brain systems level. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017; 83:281-297. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.10.015. View

14.

Streit F, Haddad L, Paul T, Frank J, Schafer A, Nikitopoulos J . A functional variant in the neuropeptide S receptor 1 gene moderates the influence of urban upbringing on stress processing in the amygdala. Stress. 2014; 17(4):352-61. DOI: 10.3109/10253890.2014.921903. View

15.

Pruessner J, Kirschbaum C, Meinlschmid G, Hellhammer D . Two formulas for computation of the area under the curve represent measures of total hormone concentration versus time-dependent change. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2003; 28(7):916-31. DOI: 10.1016/s0306-4530(02)00108-7. View

16.

Berkman E, Falk E . Beyond Brain Mapping: Using Neural Measures to Predict Real-World Outcomes. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2014; 22(1):45-50. PMC: 3903296. DOI: 10.1177/0963721412469394. View

17.

Henze G, Konzok J, Kreuzpointner L, Bartl C, Peter H, Giglberger M . Increasing Deactivation of Limbic Structures Over Psychosocial Stress Exposure Time. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2020; 5(7):697-704. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2020.04.002. View

18.

Rauch S, Whalen P, Shin L, McInerney S, Macklin M, Lasko N . Exaggerated amygdala response to masked facial stimuli in posttraumatic stress disorder: a functional MRI study. Biol Psychiatry. 2000; 47(9):769-76. DOI: 10.1016/s0006-3223(00)00828-3. View

19.

Dagher A, Tannenbaum B, Hayashi T, Pruessner J, McBride D . An acute psychosocial stress enhances the neural response to smoking cues. Brain Res. 2009; 1293:40-8. PMC: 2754394. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.07.048. View

20.

Ming Q, Zhong X, Zhang X, Pu W, Dong D, Jiang Y . State-Independent and Dependent Neural Responses to Psychosocial Stress in Current and Remitted Depression. Am J Psychiatry. 2017; 174(10):971-979. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2017.16080974. View