» Articles » PMID: 16624961

Amygdala and Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex Are Inversely Coupled During Regulation of Negative Affect and Predict the Diurnal Pattern of Cortisol Secretion Among Older Adults

Overview
Journal J Neurosci
Specialty Neurology
Date 2006 Apr 21
PMID 16624961
Citations 495
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Among younger adults, the ability to willfully regulate negative affect, enabling effective responses to stressful experiences, engages regions of prefrontal cortex (PFC) and the amygdala. Because regions of PFC and the amygdala are known to influence the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, here we test whether PFC and amygdala responses during emotion regulation predict the diurnal pattern of salivary cortisol secretion. We also test whether PFC and amygdala regions are engaged during emotion regulation in older (62- to 64-year-old) rather than younger individuals. We measured brain activity using functional magnetic resonance imaging as participants regulated (increased or decreased) their affective responses or attended to negative picture stimuli. We also collected saliva samples for 1 week at home for cortisol assay. Consistent with previous work in younger samples, increasing negative affect resulted in ventral lateral, dorsolateral, and dorsomedial regions of PFC and amygdala activation. In contrast to previous work, decreasing negative affect did not produce the predicted robust pattern of higher PFC and lower amygdala activation. Individuals demonstrating the predicted effect (decrease < attend in the amygdala), however, exhibited higher signal in ventromedial prefrontal cortex (VMPFC) for the same contrast. Furthermore, participants displaying higher VMPFC and lower amygdala signal when decreasing compared with the attention control condition evidenced steeper, more normative declines in cortisol over the course of the day. Individual differences yielded the predicted link between brain function while reducing negative affect in the laboratory and diurnal regulation of endocrine activity in the home environment.

Citing Articles

Emotional characteristics and intrinsic brain network functional connectivity among adults aged 75.

Pruitt P, Yu K, Lahna D, Schwartz D, Peltier S, Silbert L Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2025; 20(1).

PMID: 39891390 PMC: 11843004. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsaf017.


Deciphering the Neural Effects of Emotional, Motivational, and Cognitive Challenges on Inhibitory Control Processes.

Bounoua N, Stumps A, Church L, Spielberg J, Sadeh N Hum Brain Mapp. 2025; 46(2):e70137.

PMID: 39854131 PMC: 11758444. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.70137.


Targeting VMPFC-amygdala circuit with TMS in substance use disorder: A mechanistic framework.

Soleimani G, Conelea C, Kuplicki R, Opitz A, Lim K, Paulus M Addict Biol. 2025; 30(1):e70011.

PMID: 39783881 PMC: 11714170. DOI: 10.1111/adb.70011.


The effect of state gratitude on interpersonal trust under cognitive reappraisal among Chinese college students.

Abbasi N, Yi L, Yong L, Xia M, Hadi A Psicol Reflex Crit. 2024; 37(1):46.

PMID: 39570512 PMC: 11582106. DOI: 10.1186/s41155-024-00332-z.


How the arts heal: a review of the neural mechanisms behind the therapeutic effects of creative arts on mental and physical health.

Barnett K, Vasiu F Front Behav Neurosci. 2024; 18:1422361.

PMID: 39416439 PMC: 11480958. DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2024.1422361.


References
1.
Sullivan G, Apergis J, Bush D, Johnson L, Hou M, LeDoux J . Lesions in the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis disrupt corticosterone and freezing responses elicited by a contextual but not by a specific cue-conditioned fear stimulus. Neuroscience. 2004; 128(1):7-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2004.06.015. View

2.
Jackson D, Mueller C, Dolski I, Dalton K, Nitschke J, Urry H . Now you feel it, now you don't: frontal brain electrical asymmetry and individual differences in emotion regulation. Psychol Sci. 2003; 14(6):612-7. DOI: 10.1046/j.0956-7976.2003.psci_1473.x. View

3.
Janssens C, Helmond F, Wiegant V . The effect of chronic stress on plasma cortisol concentrations in cyclic female pigs depends on the time of day. Domest Anim Endocrinol. 1995; 12(2):167-77. DOI: 10.1016/0739-7240(94)00018-v. View

4.
Quirk G, Likhtik E, Pelletier J, Pare D . Stimulation of medial prefrontal cortex decreases the responsiveness of central amygdala output neurons. J Neurosci. 2003; 23(25):8800-7. PMC: 6740415. View

5.
Jackson D, Malmstadt J, Larson C, Davidson R . Suppression and enhancement of emotional responses to unpleasant pictures. Psychophysiology. 2000; 37(4):515-22. View