» Articles » PMID: 37964379

A Bedside to Bench Study of Anti-PD-1, Anti-CD40, and Anti-CSF1R Indicates That More is Not Necessarily Better

Abstract

Background: Stimulating inflammatory tumor associated macrophages can overcome resistance to PD-(L)1 blockade. We previously conducted a phase I trial of cabiralizumab (anti-CSF1R), sotigalimab (CD40-agonist) and nivolumab. Our current purpose was to study the activity and cellular effects of this three-drug regimen in anti-PD-1-resistant melanoma.

Methods: We employed a Simon's two-stage design and analyzed circulating immune cells from patients treated with this regimen for treatment-related changes. We assessed various dose levels of anti-CSF1R in murine melanoma models and studied the cellular and molecular effects.

Results: Thirteen patients were enrolled in the first stage. We observed one (7.7%) confirmed and one (7.7%) unconfirmed partial response, 5 patients had stable disease (38.5%) and 6 disease progression (42.6%). We elected not to proceed to the second stage. CyTOF analysis revealed a reduction in non-classical monocytes. Patients with prolonged stable disease or partial response who remained on study for longer had increased markers of antigen presentation after treatment compared to patients whose disease progressed rapidly. In a murine model, higher anti-CSF1R doses resulted in increased tumor growth and worse survival. Using single-cell RNA-sequencing, we identified a suppressive monocyte/macrophage population in murine tumors exposed to higher doses.

Conclusions: Higher anti-CSF1R doses are inferior to lower doses in a preclinical model, inducing a suppressive macrophage population, and potentially explaining the disappointing results observed in patients. While it is impossible to directly infer human doses from murine studies, careful intra-species evaluation can provide important insight. Cabiralizumab dose optimization is necessary for this patient population with limited treatment options.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03502330.

Citing Articles

Reprogramming Tumor-Associated Macrophage Using Nanocarriers: New Perspectives to Halt Cancer Progression.

Kuznetsova A, Kolesova E, Parodi A, Zamyatnin Jr A, Egorova V Pharmaceutics. 2024; 16(5).

PMID: 38794298 PMC: 11124960. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics16050636.

References
1.
Menzies-Gow A, Ying S, Sabroe I, Stubbs V, Soler D, Williams T . Eotaxin (CCL11) and eotaxin-2 (CCL24) induce recruitment of eosinophils, basophils, neutrophils, and macrophages as well as features of early- and late-phase allergic reactions following cutaneous injection in human atopic and nonatopic volunteers. J Immunol. 2002; 169(5):2712-8. DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.169.5.2712. View

2.
Hollmen M, Karaman S, Schwager S, Lisibach A, Christiansen A, Maksimow M . G-CSF regulates macrophage phenotype and associates with poor overall survival in human triple-negative breast cancer. Oncoimmunology. 2016; 5(3):e1115177. PMC: 4839343. DOI: 10.1080/2162402X.2015.1115177. View

3.
Bernardini N, Skroza N, Tolino E, Mambrin A, Anzalone A, Balduzzi V . IL-17 and its role in inflammatory, autoimmune, and oncological skin diseases: state of art. Int J Dermatol. 2019; 59(4):406-411. PMC: 7216999. DOI: 10.1111/ijd.14695. View

4.
Holmgaard R, Brachfeld A, Gasmi B, Jones D, Mattar M, Doman T . Timing of CSF-1/CSF-1R signaling blockade is critical to improving responses to CTLA-4 based immunotherapy. Oncoimmunology. 2016; 5(7):e1151595. PMC: 5006914. DOI: 10.1080/2162402X.2016.1151595. View

5.
Hume D, MacDonald K . Therapeutic applications of macrophage colony-stimulating factor-1 (CSF-1) and antagonists of CSF-1 receptor (CSF-1R) signaling. Blood. 2011; 119(8):1810-20. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2011-09-379214. View