» Articles » PMID: 37962745

The Association Between Embedded Catheter Implantation and Hospitalization Costs for Peritoneal Dialysis Initiation: a Retrospective Cohort Study

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty Nephrology
Date 2023 Nov 14
PMID 37962745
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Compared with the conventional peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter insertion, embedding PD catheter implantation is one of the procedures for planned PD initiation. However, facilities where embedded PD catheter implantation is available are limited, and the impact of embedded PD catheter implantation on hospitalization cost and length of hospitalization is unknown.

Methods: This retrospective single-center cohort study included 132 patients with PD initiation between 2005 and 2020. The patients were divided into two groups: 64 patients in the embedding group and 68 patients in the conventional insertion group. We created a multivariable generalized linear model (GLM) with the gamma family and log-link function to evaluate the association among catheter embedding, the duration and medical costs of hospitalization for PD initiation. We also evaluated the effect modification between age and catheter embedding.

Results: Catheter embedding (β coefficient - 0.13 [95% confidence interval - 0.21, - 0.05]) and age (per 10 years 0.08 [0.03, 0.14]) were significantly associated with hospitalization costs. Catheter embedding (- 0.21 [- 0.32, - 0.10]) and age (0.11 [0.03, 0.19]) were also identified as factors significantly associated with length of hospitalization. The difference between the embedding group and the conventional insertion group in hospitalization costs for PD initiation (P for interaction = 0.060) and the length of hospitalization (P for interaction = 0.027) was larger in young-to-middle-aged patients than in elderly patients.

Conclusions: Catheter embedding was associated with lower hospitalization cost and shorter length of hospitalization for PD initiation than conventional PD catheter insertion, especially in young-to-middle-aged patients.

References
1.
Wang V, Vilme H, Maciejewski M, Boulware L . The Economic Burden of Chronic Kidney Disease and End-Stage Renal Disease. Semin Nephrol. 2016; 36(4):319-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2016.05.008. View

2.
Bansal N, He C, Murphy D, Johansen K, Hsu C . Timing of preemptive vascular access placement: do we understand the natural history of advanced CKD?: an observational study. BMC Nephrol. 2013; 14:115. PMC: 3671964. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2369-14-115. View

3.
Sosa Barrios R, Burguera Vion V, Campillo Trapero C, Ortego Perez S, Lopez Melero E, Alvarez Nadal M . Peritoneal dialysis (PD) technique training: what features influence learning time?. Clin Exp Nephrol. 2020; 25(3):289-296. DOI: 10.1007/s10157-020-01990-w. View

4.
Shih Y, Guo A, Just P, Mujais S . Impact of initial dialysis modality and modality switches on Medicare expenditures of end-stage renal disease patients. Kidney Int. 2005; 68(1):319-29. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00413.x. View

5.
Willems S, De Maesschalck S, Deveugele M, Derese A, De Maeseneer J . Socio-economic status of the patient and doctor-patient communication: does it make a difference?. Patient Educ Couns. 2005; 56(2):139-46. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2004.02.011. View