» Articles » PMID: 20592099

Early Initiation of Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis in Patients Undergoing Surgical Implantation of Tenckhoff Catheters

Overview
Journal Perit Dial Int
Publisher Sage Publications
Date 2010 Jul 2
PMID 20592099
Citations 35
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Nephrologists commonly recommend continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) with break-in periods of at least 2 weeks. We investigated the safety and feasibility of shorter break-in periods following surgical implantation of Tenckhoff catheters.

Methods: We retrospectively examined 310 patients that underwent Tenckhoff catheter implantation for the first time. The early group comprised 226 patients that started CAPD ≤ 14 days after implantation; the late group comprised 84 patients that started CAPD > 14 days after implantation. Catheter-related complications within 6 months were analyzed.

Results: A total of 310 patients were enrolled. Time to CAPD initiation was shorter in the early group (2.0 ± 2.7 days) than in the late group (40.6 ± 42.8 days) (p < 0.001). The bridge hemodialysis rate was higher in the late group (57.1%) than in the early group (31.4%) (p < 0.001). Overall, 33 early-group (14.6%) and 11 late-group patients (13.1%) developed catheter-related complications within 6 months. The early-group complications were leakage (n = 5), diminished outflow volume (n = 7), migration (n = 7), pericatheter hernia (n = 1), hemoperitoneum (n = 1), pericatheter infection (n = 3), and peritonitis (n = 9). The late-group complications were leakage (n = 2), diminished outflow volume (n = 5), migration (n = 2), and peritonitis (n = 2). Actuarial freedom from catheter-related complications was similar in both groups (log rank, p = 0.76).

Conclusion: Early initiation of CAPD with surgically implanted Tenckhoff catheters is feasible and safe. Shorter break-in periods are not associated with more catheter-related complications. The data from our peritoneal dialysis population suggest that early initiation is not associated with an increased number of complications. This needs to be confirmed in a randomized trial.

Citing Articles

Comparative analysis of complications and technique survival in peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion: single purse-string suture vs. double purses-string suture.

Li X, Chen X, Gao H, Zhou Q, Liu W, Li P Ren Fail. 2024; 46(2):2435209.

PMID: 39659240 PMC: 11748857. DOI: 10.1080/0886022X.2024.2435209.


Comparison of immediate-start peritoneal dialysis without break-in period and conventional-start peritoneal dialysis: a two-center retrospective audit.

Wongpraphairot S, Choopun K, Sriphatphiriyakun T, Titawatanakul A, Chongsuvivatwong V, Phongphithakchai A Int Urol Nephrol. 2024; 56(7):2403-2409.

PMID: 38441870 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-024-03967-0.


Prognosis of urgent initiation of peritoneal dialysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

He J, Wu B, Zhang Y, Dai L, Ji J, Liu Y Ren Fail. 2024; 46(1):2312533.

PMID: 38391179 PMC: 10930139. DOI: 10.1080/0886022X.2024.2312533.


SAGES peritoneal dialysis access guideline update 2023.

Haggerty S, Kumar S, Collings A, Alli V, Miraflor E, Hanna N Surg Endosc. 2023; 38(1):1-23.

PMID: 37989887 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10550-8.


Is It Time to Give Peritoneal Dialysis Its Due Place in Managing Acute Kidney Injury: Lessons Learnt from COVID-19 Pandemic.

Javaid M, Ekladious A, Khan B Blood Purif. 2023; 53(2):71-79.

PMID: 37980897 PMC: 10836743. DOI: 10.1159/000535243.