» Articles » PMID: 37943394

A Descriptive Study on Isoniazid Resistance-associated Mutations, Clustering and Treatment Outcomes of Drug-resistant Tuberculosis in a High Burden Country

Abstract

Purpose: To describe katG and inhA mutations, clinical characteristics, treatment outcomes and clustering of drug-resistant tuberculosis (TB) in the State of São Paulo, southeast Brazil.

Methods: Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from patients diagnosed with drug-resistant TB were screened for mutations in katG and inhA genes by line probe assay and Sanger sequencing, and typed by IS6110-restriction fragment-length polymorphism for clustering assessment. Clinical, epidemiological and demographic data were obtained from surveillance information systems for TB.

Results: Among the 298 isolates studied, 127 (42.6%) were isoniazid-monoresistant, 36 (12.1%) polydrug-resistant, 93 (31.2%) MDR, 16 (5.4%) pre-extensively drug-resistant (pre-XDR), 9 (3%) extensively drug-resistant (XDR) and 17 (5.7%) susceptible after isoniazid retesting. The frequency of katG 315 mutations alone was higher in MDR isolates, while inhA promoter mutations alone were more common in isoniazid-monoresistant isolates. Twenty-six isolates phenotypically resistant to isoniazid had no mutations either in katG or inhA genes. The isolates with inhA mutations were found more frequently in clusters (75%) when compared to the isolates with katG 315 mutations (59.8%, p = 0.04). In our population, being 35-64 years old, presenting MDR-, pre-XDR- or XDR-TB and being a retreatment case were associated with unfavourable TB treatment outcomes.

Conclusion: We found that katG and inhA mutations were not equally distributed between isoniazid-monoresistant and MDR isolates. In our population, clustering was higher for isolates with inhA mutations. Finally, unfavourable TB outcomes were associated with specific factors.

Citing Articles

Impacts of MDR/XDR-TB on the global tuberculosis epidemic: Challenges and opportunities.

Chin K, Anibarro L, Chang Z, Palasuberniam P, Mustapha Z, Sarmiento M Curr Res Microb Sci. 2024; 7:100295.

PMID: 39512261 PMC: 11541417. DOI: 10.1016/j.crmicr.2024.100295.

References
1.
Wingfield T, Boccia D, Tovar M, Gavino A, Zevallos K, Montoya R . Defining catastrophic costs and comparing their importance for adverse tuberculosis outcome with multi-drug resistance: a prospective cohort study, Peru. PLoS Med. 2014; 11(7):e1001675. PMC: 4098993. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001675. View

2.
Pinhata J, Brandao A, Mendes F, da Silva Rabello M, Ferrazoli L, Oliveira R . Correlating genetic mutations with isoniazid phenotypic levels of resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis in a high burden setting. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021; 40(12):2551-2561. DOI: 10.1007/s10096-021-04316-0. View

3.
van Doorn H, de Haas P, Kremer K, Vandenbroucke-Grauls C, Borgdorff M, van Soolingen D . Public health impact of isoniazid-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains with a mutation at amino-acid position 315 of katG: a decade of experience in The Netherlands. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2006; 12(8):769-75. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2006.01495.x. View

5.
Adami A, Gallo J, Pinhata J, Martins M, Giampaglia C, Oliveira R . Modified protocol for drug susceptibility testing of MGIT cultures of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by the MGIT 960. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2016; 87(2):108-111. DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2016.10.023. View

6.
Gallo J, Pinhata J, Saraceni C, Oliveira R . Evaluation of the BACTEC MGIT 960 system and the resazurin microtiter assay for susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to second-line drugs. J Microbiol Methods. 2017; 139:168-171. DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2017.06.007. View