An After-Hours Virtual Care Service for Children With Medical Complexity and New Medical Technology: Mixed Methods Feasibility Study

Overview

Journal JMIR Pediatr Parent

Date 2023 Nov 8

PMID 37938869

Authors

Katherine Babayan

Krista Keilty

Jessica Esufali

Francisco J Grajales Iii

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Family caregivers (FCs) of children with medical complexity require specialized support to promote the safe management of new medical technologies (eg, gastrostomy tubes) during hospital-to-home transitions. With limited after-hours services available to families in home and community care, medical device complications that arise often lead to increased FC stress and unplanned emergency department (ED) visits. To improve FC experiences, enable safer patient discharge, and reduce after-hours ED visits, this study explores the feasibility of piloting a 24/7 virtual care service (Connected Care Live) with families to provide real-time support by clinicians expert in the use of pediatric home care technologies.

Objective: This study aims to establish the economic, operational, and technical feasibility of piloting the expansion of an existing nurse-led after-hours virtual care service offered to home and community care providers to FCs of children with newly inserted medical devices after hospital discharge at Toronto's Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids).

Methods: This exploratory study, conducted from October 2020 to August 2021, used mixed data sources to inform service expansion feasibility. Semistructured interviews were conducted with FCs, nurses, and hospital leadership to assess the risks, benefits, and technical and operational requirements for sustainable and cost-effective future service operations. Time and travel savings were estimated using ED visit data in SickKids' electronic medical records (Epic) with a chief complaint of "medical device problems," after-hours medical device inquiries from clinician emails and voicemails, and existing service operational data.

Results: A total of 30 stakeholders were interviewed and voiced the need for the proposed service. Safer and more timely management of medical device complications, improved caregiver and provider experiences, and strengthened partnerships were identified as expected benefits, while service demand, nursing practice, and privacy and security were identified as potential risks. A total of 47 inquiries were recorded over 2 weeks from March 26, 2021, to April 8, 2021, with 51% (24/47) assessed as manageable via service expansion. This study forecasted annual time and travel savings of 558 hours for SickKids and 904 hours and 22,740 km for families. Minimal technical and operational requirements were needed to support service expansion by leveraging an existing platform and clinical staff. Of the 212 ED visits related to "medical device problems" over 6 months from September 1, 2020, to February 28, 2021, enteral feeding tubes accounted for nearly two-thirds (n=137, 64.6%), with 41.6% (57/137) assessed as virtually manageable.

Conclusions: Our findings indicate that it is feasible to pilot the expansion of Connected Care Live to FCs of children with newly inserted enteral feeding tubes. This nurse-led virtual caregiver service is a promising tool to promote safe hospital-to-home transitions, improve FC experiences, and reduce after-hours ED visits.

References

Nackers A, Ehlenbach M, Kelly M, Werner N, Warner G, Coller R . Encounters From Device Complications Among Children With Medical Complexity. Hosp Pediatr. 2018; 9(1):6-15. PMC: 6303085. DOI: 10.1542/hpeds.2018-0103. View

Lefebre N, Sharkey S, Virani T, Fu K, Brown M, Ackerman M . Lessons on COVID-19 from Home and Community: Perspectives of Nursing Leaders at All Levels. Nurs Leadersh (Tor Ont). 2021; 33(4):51-61. DOI: 10.12927/cjnl.2021.26420. View

Cameron D, Serres S, Glass C, Milliren C, Graham D, Anandalwar S . Leveraging the Incidence, Burden, and Fiscal Implications of Unplanned Hospital Revisits for the Prioritization of Prevention Efforts in Pediatric Surgery. Ann Surg. 2018; 271(1):191-199. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002885. View

Barreda C, Ehlenbach M, Nackers A, Kelly M, Shadman K, Sklansky D . Complex Care Program Enrollment and Change in ED and Hospital Visits from Medical Device Complications. Pediatr Qual Saf. 2021; 6(5):e450. PMC: 8389945. DOI: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000450. View

Moltu C, Stefansen J, Svisdahl M, Veseth M . Negotiating the coresearcher mandate - service users' experiences of doing collaborative research on mental health. Disabil Rehabil. 2012; 34(19):1608-16. DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2012.656792. View

Berman L, Hronek C, Raval M, Browne M, Snyder C, Heiss K . Pediatric Gastrostomy Tube Placement: Lessons Learned from High-performing Institutions through Structured Interviews. Pediatr Qual Saf. 2018; 2(2):e016. PMC: 6132912. DOI: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000016. View

Ly O, Price D, Saskin R, Howard M . Low-acuity emergency department use among patients in different primary care models in Hamilton and Ontario. Healthc Manage Forum. 2021; 34(4):234-239. PMC: 8225686. DOI: 10.1177/08404704211012027. View

Khalil S, Uhing M, Duesing L, Visotcky A, Tarima S, Hang Nghiem-Rao T . Outcomes of Infants With Home Tube Feeding: Comparing Nasogastric vs Gastrostomy Tubes. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2016; 41(8):1380-1385. PMC: 5727911. DOI: 10.1177/0148607116670621. View

Chan Y, Lim C, Bautista D, Malhotra R, Ostbye T . The Health and Well-Being of Caregivers of Technologically Dependent Children. Glob Pediatr Health. 2019; 6:2333794X18823000. PMC: 6348537. DOI: 10.1177/2333794X18823000. View

10.

Pulcini C, Coller R, Houtrow A, Belardo Z, Zorc J . Preventing Emergency Department Visits for Children With Medical Complexity Through Ambulatory Care: A Systematic Review. Acad Pediatr. 2021; 21(4):605-616. DOI: 10.1016/j.acap.2021.01.006. View

11.

Ruffolo L, McGuire A, Calderon T, Wolcott K, Levatino E, Martin H . Emergency department utilization following pediatric gastrostomy tube placement is driven by a small cohort of patients. J Pediatr Surg. 2020; 56(5):961-965. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2020.07.016. View

12.

Hsieh H, Shannon S . Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005; 15(9):1277-88. DOI: 10.1177/1049732305276687. View

13.

Dick P, Bennie J, Barden W, Daniels C, Young N . Preference for pediatric telehome care support following hospitalization: a report on preference and satisfaction. Telemed J E Health. 2013; 10 Suppl 2:S-45-53. View

14.

Page B, Butler S, Smith C, Lee A, Vincent C . Training and support for caring for a child's gastrostomy: a survey with family carers. BMJ Paediatr Open. 2021; 5(1):e001068. PMC: 8317118. DOI: 10.1136/bmjpo-2021-001068. View

15.

Barrett D, Li V, Merrick S, Murugananthan A, Steed H . The Hidden Burden of Community Enteral Feeding on the Emergency Department. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2020; 45(6):1347-1351. DOI: 10.1002/jpen.2021. View

16.

Volpe A, Malakounides G . Feeding tubes in children. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2018; 30(5):665-670. DOI: 10.1097/MOP.0000000000000666. View

17.

McCarthy S, Currier D, Copp K, Donovan K . Partnering With Families of Medically Complex Children Transitioning From the Hospital to Home. Pediatrics. 2021; 148(1). DOI: 10.1542/peds.2020-031617. View

18.

Kelly P, Beck A, Baker A, Deane F, Hides L, Manning V . Feasibility of a Mobile Health App for Routine Outcome Monitoring and Feedback in Mutual Support Groups Coordinated by SMART Recovery Australia: Protocol for a Pilot Study. JMIR Res Protoc. 2020; 9(7):e15113. PMC: 7380906. DOI: 10.2196/15113. View

19.

Northington L, Lyman B, Moore C, Guenter P . Pediatric Nasogastric Tubes in the Home: Recommendations for Practice. Home Healthc Now. 2018; 36(3):148-153. DOI: 10.1097/NHH.0000000000000650. View

20.

Kubicek K, Liu D, Beaudin C, Supan J, Weiss G, Lu Y . A profile of nonurgent emergency department use in an urban pediatric hospital. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2012; 28(10):977-84. PMC: 3464348. DOI: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31826c9aab. View