» Articles » PMID: 33969739

Low-acuity Emergency Department Use Among Patients in Different Primary Care Models in Hamilton and Ontario

Overview
Specialty Health Services
Date 2021 May 10
PMID 33969739
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Jurisdictions such as Hamilton, Ontario, where most primary care practices participate in patient enrolment models with enhanced after-hours access, may demonstrate overall improved health equity outcomes. Non-urgent Emergency Department (ED) use has been suggested as an indicator of primary care access; however, the impact of primary care access on ED use is uncertain and likely varies by patient and contextual factors. This population-based, retrospective study investigated whether or not different primary care models were associated with different rates of non-urgent ED visits in Hamilton, a city with relatively high neighbourhood marginalization, compared to the rest of Ontario from 2014/2015 to 2017/2018. In Ontario, enrolment capitation-based practices had more non-urgent ED visits than non-enrolment fee-for-service practices. In Hamilton, where most of the city's family physicians are in enrolment capitation-based practices, differences between models were minimal. The influence of primary care reforms may differ depending on how they are distributed within regions.

Citing Articles

An After-Hours Virtual Care Service for Children With Medical Complexity and New Medical Technology: Mixed Methods Feasibility Study.

Babayan K, Keilty K, Esufali J, Grajales Iii F JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2023; 6:e41393.

PMID: 37938869 PMC: 10666005. DOI: 10.2196/41393.


Identification of low-acuity attendances in routine clinical information documented in German Emergency Departments.

Slagman A, Fischer-Rosinsky A, Legg D, Schmieder K, Mockel M BMC Emerg Med. 2023; 23(1):64.

PMID: 37280527 PMC: 10243890. DOI: 10.1186/s12873-023-00838-2.


Inclusion of patient-level emergency department characteristics to classify potentially redirectable visits to subacute care: a modified Delphi consensus study.

Strum R, Tavares W, Worster A, Griffith L, Costa A CMAJ Open. 2023; 11(1):E70-E76.

PMID: 36693658 PMC: 9876581. DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20220062.


The Delivery of Patient Care in Ontario's Family Health Teams during the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Ashcroft R, Donnelly C, Gill S, Dancey M, Lam S, Grill A Healthc Policy. 2021; 17(2):72-89.

PMID: 34895411 PMC: 8665725. DOI: 10.12927/hcpol.2021.26656.

References
1.
Jones P, Jones J, OBrien K, Lee-Poy M . Predictors of Low-Acuity Emergency Department Use by Patients Enrolled in a Family Health Team. CJEM. 2015; 17(4):359-66. DOI: 10.1017/cem.2014.46. View

2.
Khan Y, Glazier R, Moineddin R, Schull M . A population-based study of the association between socioeconomic status and emergency department utilization in Ontario, Canada. Acad Emerg Med. 2011; 18(8):836-43. DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01127.x. View

3.
Glazier R, Klein-Geltink J, Kopp A, Sibley L . Capitation and enhanced fee-for-service models for primary care reform: a population-based evaluation. CMAJ. 2009; 180(11):E72-81. PMC: 2683211. DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.081316. View

4.
Austin P, Daly P, Tu J . A multicenter study of the coding accuracy of hospital discharge administrative data for patients admitted to cardiac care units in Ontario. Am Heart J. 2002; 144(2):290-6. DOI: 10.1067/mhj.2002.123839. View

5.
Oandasan I, Malik R, Waters I, Lambert-Lanning A . Being community-responsive physicians. Doing the right thing. Can Fam Physician. 2004; 50:1004-10. PMC: 2214636. View