» Articles » PMID: 37936745

Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy for Multi-segmental Lumbar Disc Herniation

Overview
Journal Pak J Med Sci
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2023 Nov 8
PMID 37936745
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) in the treatment of multi-segmental lumbar disc herniation (msLDH).

Methods: From January 2021 to December 2021, 75 patients with msLDH admitted to Baoding No.1 Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine were selected and divided into PTED group (n=40) and posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) group (n=35) according to different surgical methods. The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, surgical complications, Oswestry disability index (ODI) and Japanese Orthopedic Association score (JOA) scores were compared between the two groups.

Results: In the PTED group, the average operation time was 57.45±12.01minutes, and the average intraoperative blood loss was 50.57±16.69ml. There were three patients with surgical complications, including one case of hematoma, one case of aggravation of neurological symptoms and one case of new onset of neurological symptoms. In the PLIF group, there were 12 cases undergoing single-segment operation, 15 cases undergoing double-segment operation and 8 cases undergoing three-segment operation, the average operation time was 137.26±34.64minutes, and the average intraoperative blood loss was 456.06±33.06ml, there were four cases of wound fat liquefaction or delayed healing, two cases of hematoma, and three cases of exacerbation of original neurological symptoms or new neurological symptoms. At one month, six months, and one year of postoperative, the ODI and JOA scores of the two groups were significantly improved compared with those preoperative, and the ODI scores of the PTED group were better than those of the PLIF group (t=3.131, 2.263, 3.768, all P<0.05).

Conclusion: The surgical effect of PTED in the treatment of LDH is similar to that of PLIF. However, PTED has the advantages of short operation time, less blood loss, fewer surgical complications, and high surgical safety. It is worthy of clinical promotion.

Citing Articles

Risk factors and prevention strategy for patient dissatisfaction after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a single-center retrospective study.

Yang L, Guo Z, Qiao Y, Guo J, Li J, Wang W Front Surg. 2025; 12:1545591.

PMID: 40008249 PMC: 11850332. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1545591.


Comparative analysis of the efficacy of oblique lateral interbody fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation.

Chen D, Liu T, Du K, Zhu Z Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):29497.

PMID: 39604482 PMC: 11603332. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-81261-w.

References
1.
Cole C, McCall T, Schmidt M, Dailey A . Comparison of low back fusion techniques: transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) or posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) approaches. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2009; 2(2):118-26. PMC: 2697340. DOI: 10.1007/s12178-009-9053-8. View

2.
Amin R, Andrade N, Neuman B . Lumbar Disc Herniation. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2017; 10(4):507-516. PMC: 5685963. DOI: 10.1007/s12178-017-9441-4. View

3.
Clarencon F, Law-Ye B, Bienvenot P, Cormier E, Chiras J . The Degenerative Spine. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2016; 24(3):495-513. DOI: 10.1016/j.mric.2016.04.008. View

4.
Hoffman H, Choi A, Chang V, Kimball J, Verkman A, Virani R . Aquaporin-1 Expression in Herniated Human Lumbar Intervertebral Discs. Global Spine J. 2017; 7(2):133-140. PMC: 5415154. DOI: 10.1177/2192568217694007. View

5.
Drysch A, Ajiboye R, Sharma A, Li J, Reza T, Harley D . Effectiveness of Reoperations for Adjacent Segment Disease Following Lumbar Spinal Fusion. Orthopedics. 2017; 41(2):e161-e167. DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20170621-02. View