» Articles » PMID: 18923325

Sciatica: Review of Epidemiological Studies and Prevalence Estimates

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2008 Oct 17
PMID 18923325
Citations 193
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Study Design: Review of studies on sciatica prevalence and synthesis of available evidence.

Objective: To assess the studies on sciatica prevalence, discuss reasons for variation in estimates, provide suggestions for improving accuracy of recording sciatica in epidemiological and outcome studies so as to enable better evaluation of natural history and treatment effect in the presence of low back pain related sciatica.

Summary Of Background Data: Sciatica is a common cause of pain and disability. It is more persistent and severe than low back pain, has a less favorable outcome and consumes more health resources. However, sciatica prevalence rates reported in different studies and reviews vary considerably and provide no clear picture about sciatica prevalence.

Methods: A literature search of all English language peer reviewed publications was conducted using Medline, EMBASE, and CINAHL for the years 1980-2006. Two reviewers extracted data on sciatica prevalence and definitions from the identified articles.

Results: Of the papers retrieved, 23 were included in the review. Only 2 studies out of the 23 used clinical assessment for assessing sciatic symptoms, and definitions of sciatica varied widely. Sciatica prevalence from different studies ranged from 1.2% to 43%.

Conclusion: Sciatica prevalence estimates vary considerably between studies. This may be due to differences in definitions, methods of data collection and perhaps populations studied. Suggestions are made on how to improve accuracy of capturing sciatica in epidemiological studies.

Citing Articles

Factors associated with improved outcomes after lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections for radicular pain: A systematic review.

Fromm M, Liu S, Carr C, Stefancic E, Rogalski M N Am Spine Soc J. 2025; 21:100592.

PMID: 40065830 PMC: 11891702. DOI: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2025.100592.


Comparative Effectiveness of Non-Pharmacological and Pharmacological Treatments for Non-Acute Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Multicenter, Pragmatic, Randomized Controlled, Parallel-Grouped Pilot Study.

Kim D, Lee J, Lee Y, Yang C, Han C, Ha I J Clin Med. 2025; 14(4).

PMID: 40004733 PMC: 11856646. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14041204.


How Painful are Lumbar Hernias? A Comprehensive Review of Intervention Strategies.

Moreno-Gomez-Toledano R, Mendez-Meson I, Aguado-Henche S, Sebastian-Martin A, Grande-Alonso M Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2025; 29(1):34.

PMID: 39862368 PMC: 11762575. DOI: 10.1007/s11916-024-01342-3.


Learning curve insights in Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic (UBE) spinal procedures: proficiency cutoffs and the impact on efficiency and complications.

Peng J, Lin R, Fang D, He Z, Zhao Q, Li Q Eur Spine J. 2025; 34(3):954-973.

PMID: 39751813 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-024-08632-9.


[Lumbar disc herniation].

Heider F, Siepe C Orthopadie (Heidelb). 2024; 54(1):3-17.

PMID: 39613966 DOI: 10.1007/s00132-024-04586-4.