» Articles » PMID: 37936601

Identifying Mitral Valve Prolapse at Risk for Arrhythmias and Fibrosis From Electrocardiograms Using Deep Learning

Abstract

Background: Mitral valve prolapse (MVP) is a common valvulopathy, with a subset developing sudden cardiac death or cardiac arrest. Complex ventricular ectopy (ComVE) is a marker of arrhythmic risk associated with myocardial fibrosis and increased mortality in MVP.

Objectives: The authors sought to evaluate whether electrocardiogram (ECG)-based machine learning can identify MVP at risk for ComVE, death and/or myocardial fibrosis on cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging.

Methods: A deep convolutional neural network (CNN) was trained to detect ComVE using 6,916 12-lead ECGs from 569 MVP patients from the University of California-San Francisco between 2012 and 2020. A separate CNN was trained to detect late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) using 1,369 ECGs from 87 MVP patients with contrast CMR.

Results: The prevalence of ComVE was 28% (160/569). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the CNN to detect ComVE was 0.80 (95% CI: 0.77-0.83) and remained high after excluding patients with moderate-severe mitral regurgitation [0.80 (95% CI: 0.77-0.83)] or bileaflet MVP [0.81 (95% CI: 0.76-0.85)]. AUC to detect all-cause mortality was 0.82 (95% CI: 0.77-0.87). ECG segments relevant to ComVE prediction were related to ventricular depolarization/repolarization (early-mid ST-segment and QRS from V, V, and III). LGE in the papillary muscles or basal inferolateral wall was present in 24% patients with available CMR; AUC for detection of LGE was 0.75 (95% CI: 0.68-0.82).

Conclusions: CNN-analyzed 12-lead ECGs can detect MVP at risk for ventricular arrhythmias, death and/or fibrosis and can identify novel ECG correlates of arrhythmic risk. ECG-based CNNs may help select those MVP patients requiring closer follow-up and/or a CMR.

Citing Articles

The Role of Machine Learning in the Detection of Cardiac Fibrosis in Electrocardiograms: Scoping Review.

Handra J, James H, Mbilinyi A, Moller-Hansen A, ORiley C, Andrade J JMIR Cardio. 2025; 8:e60697.

PMID: 39753213 PMC: 11730231. DOI: 10.2196/60697.


Interstitial fibrosis and arrhythmic mitral valve prolapse: Unraveling sex-based differences.

Tastet L, Dixit S, Jhawar R, Nguyen T, Al-Akchar M, Bibby D J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2024; 26(2):101117.

PMID: 39477155 PMC: 11652916. DOI: 10.1016/j.jocmr.2024.101117.


Feasibility validation of automatic diagnosis of mitral valve prolapse from multi-view echocardiographic sequences based on deep neural network.

Wu Z, Ge Z, Ge Z, Xing Y, Zhao W, Dong L Eur Heart J Imaging Methods Pract. 2024; 2(4):qyae086.

PMID: 39474265 PMC: 11519029. DOI: 10.1093/ehjimp/qyae086.


Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Electrocardiographic Analysis in Mitral Valve Prolapse: Hunting for Zebras.

Sabbag A, Siontis K JACC Adv. 2024; 2(6):100443.

PMID: 38939427 PMC: 11198173. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2023.100443.


Serial Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Mitral Valve Prolapse-A Single-Center Retrospective Registry.

Blondeel M, LHoyes W, Robyns T, Verbrugghe P, De Meester P, Dresselaers T J Clin Med. 2024; 13(9).

PMID: 38731198 PMC: 11084857. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13092669.

References
1.
Grigioni F, Enriquez-Sarano M, Ling L, Bailey K, Seward J, Tajik A . Sudden death in mitral regurgitation due to flail leaflet. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999; 34(7):2078-85. DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(99)00474-x. View

2.
Levy D, Savage D . Prevalence and clinical features of mitral valve prolapse. Am Heart J. 1987; 113(5):1281-90. DOI: 10.1016/0002-8703(87)90956-2. View

3.
Bumgarner J, Patel D, Kumar A, Clevenger J, Trulock K, Popovic Z . Management and outcomes in mitral valve prolapse with ventricular arrhythmias undergoing ablation and/or implantation of ICDs. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2019; 42(4):447-452. DOI: 10.1111/pace.13613. View

4.
Ermakov S, Gulhar R, Lim L, Bibby D, Fang Q, Nah G . Left ventricular mechanical dispersion predicts arrhythmic risk in mitral valve prolapse. Heart. 2019; 105(14):1063-1069. PMC: 6658737. DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2018-314269. View

5.
Hughes J, Olgin J, Avram R, Abreau S, Sittler T, Radia K . Performance of a Convolutional Neural Network and Explainability Technique for 12-Lead Electrocardiogram Interpretation. JAMA Cardiol. 2021; 6(11):1285-1295. PMC: 8340011. DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2021.2746. View