» Articles » PMID: 10588227

Sudden Death in Mitral Regurgitation Due to Flail Leaflet

Overview
Date 1999 Dec 10
PMID 10588227
Citations 66
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: We sought to assess the incidence and determinants of sudden death (SUD) in mitral regurgitation due to flail leaflet (MR-FL).

Background: Sudden death is a catastrophic complication of MR-FL. Its incidence and predictability are undefined.

Methods: The occurrence of SUD was analyzed in 348 patients (age 67 +/- 12 years) with MR-FL diagnosed echocardiographically from 1980 through 1994.

Results: During a mean follow-up of 48 +/- 41 months, 99 deaths occurred under medical treatment. Sudden death occurred in 25 patients, three of whom were resuscitated. The sudden death rates at five and 10 years were 8.6 +/- 2% and 18.8 +/- 4%, respectively, and the linearized rate was 1.8% per year. By multivariate analysis, the independent baseline predictors of SUD were New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class (p = 0.006), ejection fraction (p = 0.0001) and atrial fibrillation (p = 0.059). The yearly linearized rate of sudden death was 1% in patients in functional class I, 3.1% in class II and 7.8% in classes III and IV. However, of 25 patients who had SUD, at baseline, 10 (40%) were in functional class I, 9 (36%) were in class II and only 6 (24%) in class III or IV. In five patients (20%), no evidence of risk factors developed until SUD. In patients with an ejection fraction > or =60% and sinus rhythm, the linearized rate of SUD was not different in functional classes I and II (0.8% per year). Surgical correction of MR (n = 186) was independently associated with a reduced incidence of SUD (adjusted hazard ratio [95% confidence interval] 0.29 [0.11 to 0.72], p = 0.007).

Conclusions: Sudden death is relatively common in patients with MR-FL who are conservatively managed. Patients with severe symptoms, atrial fibrillation and reduced systolic function are at higher risk, but notable rates of SUD have been observed without these risk factors. Correction of MR appears to be associated with a reduced incidence of SUD, warranting early consideration of surgical repair.

Citing Articles

Inheritance of Imaging Parameters of Arrhythmic Risk in Mitral Valve Prolapse: A Pedigree Study.

Cristin L, Dixit S, Bibby D, Tang J, Fang Q, Tastet L Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2025; 18(1):e017051.

PMID: 39764632 PMC: 11753933. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.124.017051.


Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with mitral valve prolapse.

Figliozzi S, Di Maio S, Georgiopoulos G, Vandenberk B, Chiribiri A, Francone M J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2024; 27(1):101137.

PMID: 39725235 PMC: 11786644. DOI: 10.1016/j.jocmr.2024.101137.


Arrhythmogenic Mitral Valve Prolapse: Can We Risk Stratify and Prevent Sudden Cardiac Death?.

Cameron J, Kadhim K, Kamsani S, Han H, Farouque O, Sanders P Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2024; 13:e11.

PMID: 39145277 PMC: 11322952. DOI: 10.15420/aer.2023.26.


Noncomplex ventricular arrhythmia associated with greater freedom from recurrent ectopy at 1 year after mitral repair surgery.

Pandis D, David N, Ei-Eshmawi A, Miller M, Boateng P, Costa A JTCVS Open. 2024; 19:94-113.

PMID: 39015439 PMC: 11247206. DOI: 10.1016/j.xjon.2024.04.005.


Arrhythmic Mitral Valve Prolapse Phenotype: An Unsupervised Machine Learning Analysis Using a Multicenter Cardiac MRI Registry.

Akyea R, Figliozzi S, Lopes P, Bauer K, Moura-Ferreira S, Tondi L Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging. 2024; 6(3):e230247.

PMID: 38900026 PMC: 11211946. DOI: 10.1148/ryct.230247.