Influence of Polymer Stiffness and Geometric Design on Fluid Mechanics in Tissue-Engineered Pulmonary Valve Scaffolds

Overview

Journal Ann Biomed Eng

Specialty Biomedical Engineering

Date 2023 Nov 7

PMID 37935910

Authors

Drake D Pedersen

Seungil Kim

Antonio DAmore

William R Wagner

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

There is still much unknown about the fluid mechanical response to cardiac valve scaffolds, even as their implementation in the clinic is on the horizon. Specifically, while degradable polymer valve scaffolds are currently being tested in the pulmonary valve position, their material and mechanical properties have not been fully elucidated. Optimizing these properties are important determinants not only of acute function, but long-term remodeling prospects. This study aimed to characterize fluid profiles downstream of electrospun valve scaffolds under dynamic pulmonary conditions. Valve scaffold design was changed by either blending poly(carbonate urethane) urea (PCUU) with poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) to modulate material stiffness or by changing the geometric design of the valve scaffolds. Specifically, two designs were utilized: one modeled after a clinically used bioprosthetic valve design (termed Mk1 design), and another using a geometrically "optimized" design (termed Mk2) based on anatomical data. Particle image velocimetry results showed that material stiffness only had a mild impact on fluid mechanics, measured by velocity magnitude, vorticity, viscous shear stress, Reynolds shear stress, and turbulent kinetic energy. However, comparing the two geometric designs yielded a much greater impact, with the Mk2 valve groups containing the highest PCUU/PCL ratio demonstrating the overall best performance. This report highlights the easily manipulable design features of polymeric valve scaffolds and demonstrates their relative significance for valve function.

References

Kluin J, Talacua H, Smits A, Emmert M, Brugmans M, Fioretta E . In situ heart valve tissue engineering using a bioresorbable elastomeric implant - From material design to 12 months follow-up in sheep. Biomaterials. 2017; 125:101-117. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.02.007. View

Bennink G, Torii S, Brugmans M, Cox M, Svanidze O, Ladich E . A novel restorative pulmonary valved conduit in a chronic sheep model: Mid-term hemodynamic function and histologic assessment. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018; 155(6):2591-2601.e3. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.12.046. View

Uiterwijk M, Smits A, van Geemen D, van Klarenbosch B, Dekker S, Cramer M . In Situ Remodeling Overrules Bioinspired Scaffold Architecture of Supramolecular Elastomeric Tissue-Engineered Heart Valves. JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2021; 5(12):1187-1206. PMC: 7775962. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2020.09.011. View

De Kort B, Marzi J, Brauchle E, Lichauco A, Bauer H, Serrero A . Inflammatory and regenerative processes in bioresorbable synthetic pulmonary valves up to two years in sheep-Spatiotemporal insights augmented by Raman microspectroscopy. Acta Biomater. 2021; 135:243-259. DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2021.09.005. View

Arjunon S, Rathan S, Jo H, Yoganathan A . Aortic valve: mechanical environment and mechanobiology. Ann Biomed Eng. 2013; 41(7):1331-46. PMC: 5460154. DOI: 10.1007/s10439-013-0785-7. View

Coyan G, DAmore A, Matsumura Y, Pedersen D, Luketich S, Shanov V . In vivo functional assessment of a novel degradable metal and elastomeric scaffold-based tissue engineered heart valve. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018; 157(5):1809-1816. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.09.128. View

Coyan G, Silveira-Filho L, Matsumura Y, Luketich S, Katz W, Badhwar V . Acute In Vivo Functional Assessment of a Biodegradable Stentless Elastomeric Tricuspid Valve. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2020; 13(5):796-805. DOI: 10.1007/s12265-020-09960-z. View

Puperi D, Kishan A, Punske Z, Wu Y, Cosgriff-Hernandez E, West J . Electrospun Polyurethane and Hydrogel Composite Scaffolds as Biomechanical Mimics for Aortic Valve Tissue Engineering. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2021; 2(9):1546-1558. PMC: 10615647. DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00309. View

DAmore A, Luketich S, Raffa G, Olia S, Menallo G, Mazzola A . Heart valve scaffold fabrication: Bioinspired control of macro-scale morphology, mechanics and micro-structure. Biomaterials. 2017; 150:25-37. PMC: 5988585. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.10.011. View

10.

Capulli A, Emmert M, Pasqualini F, Kehl D, Caliskan E, Lind J . JetValve: Rapid manufacturing of biohybrid scaffolds for biomimetic heart valve replacement. Biomaterials. 2017; 133:229-241. PMC: 5526340. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.04.033. View

11.

Saidy N, Wolf F, Bas O, Keijdener H, Hutmacher D, Mela P . Biologically Inspired Scaffolds for Heart Valve Tissue Engineering via Melt Electrowriting. Small. 2019; 15(24):e1900873. DOI: 10.1002/smll.201900873. View

12.

Pedersen D, Kim S, DAmore A, Wagner W . Cardiac valve scaffold design: Implications of material properties and geometric configuration on performance and mechanics. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2023; 146:106043. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.106043. View

13.

Loerakker S, Argento G, Oomens C, Baaijens F . Effects of valve geometry and tissue anisotropy on the radial stretch and coaptation area of tissue-engineered heart valves. J Biomech. 2013; 46(11):1792-800. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.05.015. View

14.

Abbasi M, Azadani A . A geometry optimization framework for transcatheter heart valve leaflet design. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2019; 102:103491. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103491. View

15.

Bui H, Ishrat A, James S, Prasad Dasi L . Design consideration of a novel polymeric transcatheter heart valve through computational modeling. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2022; 135:105434. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.105434. View

16.

Lee J, Rygg A, Kolahdouz E, Rossi S, Retta S, Duraiswamy N . Fluid-Structure Interaction Models of Bioprosthetic Heart Valve Dynamics in an Experimental Pulse Duplicator. Ann Biomed Eng. 2020; 48(5):1475-1490. PMC: 7154025. DOI: 10.1007/s10439-020-02466-4. View

17.

Zakerzadeh R, Hsu M, Sacks M . Computational methods for the aortic heart valve and its replacements. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2017; 14(11):849-866. PMC: 6542368. DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2017.1389274. View

18.

Emmert M, Schmitt B, Loerakker S, Sanders B, Spriestersbach H, Fioretta E . Computational modeling guides tissue-engineered heart valve design for long-term in vivo performance in a translational sheep model. Sci Transl Med. 2018; 10(440). DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aan4587. View

19.

Leo H, Prasad Dasi L, Carberry J, Simon H, Yoganathan A . Fluid dynamic assessment of three polymeric heart valves using particle image velocimetry. Ann Biomed Eng. 2006; 34(6):936-52. DOI: 10.1007/s10439-006-9117-5. View

20.

Ge L, Dasi L, Sotiropoulos F, Yoganathan A . Characterization of hemodynamic forces induced by mechanical heart valves: Reynolds vs. viscous stresses. Ann Biomed Eng. 2007; 36(2):276-97. DOI: 10.1007/s10439-007-9411-x. View