» Articles » PMID: 37928448

Machine Learning Algorithms in Microbial Classification: a Comparative Analysis

Overview
Date 2023 Nov 6
PMID 37928448
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This research paper presents an overview of contemporary machine learning methodologies and their utilization in the domain of healthcare and the prevention of infectious diseases, specifically focusing on the classification and identification of bacterial species. As deep learning techniques have gained prominence in the healthcare sector, a diverse array of architectural models has emerged. Through a comprehensive review of pertinent literature, multiple studies employing machine learning algorithms in the context of microbial diagnosis and classification are examined. Each investigation entails a tabulated presentation of data, encompassing details about the training and validation datasets, specifications of the machine learning and deep learning techniques employed, as well as the evaluation metrics utilized to gauge algorithmic performance. Notably, Convolutional Neural Networks have been the predominant selection for image classification tasks by machine learning practitioners over the last decade. This preference stems from their ability to autonomously extract pertinent and distinguishing features with minimal human intervention. A range of CNN architectures have been developed and effectively applied in the realm of image classification. However, addressing the considerable data requirements of deep learning, recent advancements encompass the application of pre-trained models using transfer learning for the identification of microbial entities. This method involves repurposing the knowledge gleaned from solving alternate image classification challenges to accurately classify microbial images. Consequently, the necessity for extensive and varied training data is significantly mitigated. This study undertakes a comparative assessment of various popular pre-trained CNN architectures for the classification of bacteria. The dataset employed is composed of approximately 660 images, representing 33 bacterial species. To enhance dataset diversity, data augmentation is implemented, followed by evaluation on multiple models including AlexNet, VGGNet, Inception networks, Residual Networks, and Densely Connected Convolutional Networks. The results indicate that the DenseNet-121 architecture yields the optimal performance, achieving a peak accuracy of 99.08%, precision of 99.06%, recall of 99.00%, and an F1-score of 98.99%. By demonstrating the proficiency of the DenseNet-121 model on a comparatively modest dataset, this study underscores the viability of transfer learning in the healthcare sector for precise and efficient microbial identification. These findings contribute to the ongoing endeavors aimed at harnessing machine learning techniques to enhance healthcare methodologies and bolster infectious disease prevention practices.

Citing Articles

A machine learning-based strategy to elucidate the identification of antibiotic resistance in bacteria.

Parthasarathi K, Gaikwad K, Rajesh S, Rana S, Pandey A, Singh H Front Antibiot. 2025; 3():1405296.

PMID: 39816256 PMC: 11732175. DOI: 10.3389/frabi.2024.1405296.


Lactate-related gene signatures as prognostic predictors and comprehensive analysis of immune profiles in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Liu C, Ni C, Li C, Tian H, Jian W, Zhong Y J Transl Med. 2024; 22(1):1116.

PMID: 39707377 PMC: 11662464. DOI: 10.1186/s12967-024-05935-9.


ANS-SCMC: A matrix completion method based on adaptive neighbourhood similarity and sparse constraints for predicting microbe-disease associations.

Wen H, Zhong X, Lin L, Chen L J Cell Mol Med. 2024; 28(18):e70071.

PMID: 39300612 PMC: 11412915. DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.70071.


Editorial: Detection, characterization, and management of plant pathogens.

Hamim I, Sipes B, Wang Y Front Plant Sci. 2024; 15:1354042.

PMID: 38414641 PMC: 10897511. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1354042.

References
1.
Ho C, Jean N, Hogan C, Blackmon L, Jeffrey S, Holodniy M . Rapid identification of pathogenic bacteria using Raman spectroscopy and deep learning. Nat Commun. 2019; 10(1):4927. PMC: 6960993. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-12898-9. View

2.
Croxatto A, Marcelpoil R, Orny C, Morel D, ProdHom G, Greub G . Towards automated detection, semi-quantification and identification of microbial growth in clinical bacteriology: A proof of concept. Biomed J. 2018; 40(6):317-328. PMC: 6138813. DOI: 10.1016/j.bj.2017.09.001. View

3.
Min S, Lee B, Yoon S . Deep learning in bioinformatics. Brief Bioinform. 2016; 18(5):851-869. DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbw068. View

4.
Fend R, Kolk A, Bessant C, Buijtels P, Klatser P, Woodman A . Prospects for clinical application of electronic-nose technology to early detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in culture and sputum. J Clin Microbiol. 2006; 44(6):2039-45. PMC: 1489436. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01591-05. View

5.
Hagan M, Menhaj M . Training feedforward networks with the Marquardt algorithm. IEEE Trans Neural Netw. 1994; 5(6):989-93. DOI: 10.1109/72.329697. View