» Articles » PMID: 37904748

Exploring the Validity of GOLD 2023 Guidelines: Should GOLD C and D Be Combined?

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: The GOLD (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease) 2023 guidelines proposed important changes to the stratification of disease severity using the "ABCD" assessment tool. The highest risk groups "C" and "D" were combined into a single category "E" based on exacerbation history, no longer considering symptomology.

Purpose: We quantify the differential disease progression of individuals initially stratified by the GOLD 2022 "ABCD" scheme to evaluate these proposed changes.

Patients And Methods: We utilise data collected from 1529 users of the myCOPD mobile app, a widely used and clinically validated app supporting people living with COPD in the UK. For patients in each GOLD group, we quantify symptoms using COPD Assessment Tests (CAT) and rate of exacerbation over a 12-month period post classification.

Results: CAT scores for users initially classified into GOLD C and GOLD D remain significantly different after 12 months (Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistic = 0.59, P = 8.2 × 10). Users initially classified into GOLD C demonstrate a significantly lower exacerbation rate over the 12 months post classification than those initially in GOLD D (Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistic = 0.26; P = 3.1 × 10; all exacerbations). Further, those initially classified as GOLD B have higher CAT scores and exacerbation rates than GOLD C in the following 12 months.

Conclusion: CAT scores remain important for stratifying disease progression both in-terms of symptomology and future exacerbation risk. Based on this evidence, the merger of GOLD C and GOLD D should be reconsidered.

References
1.
Cooper R, Giangreco A, Duffy M, Finlayson E, Hamilton S, Swanson M . Evaluation of myCOPD Digital Self-management Technology in a Remote and Rural Population: Real-world Feasibility Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022; 10(2):e30782. PMC: 8861861. DOI: 10.2196/30782. View

2.
Chmiel F, Burns D, Pickering J, Blythin A, Wilkinson T, Boniface M . Prediction of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbation Events by Using Patient Self-reported Data in a Digital Health App: Statistical Evaluation and Machine Learning Approach. JMIR Med Inform. 2022; 10(3):e26499. PMC: 8981014. DOI: 10.2196/26499. View

3.
Rabe K, Hurd S, Anzueto A, Barnes P, Buist S, Calverley P . Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: GOLD executive summary. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007; 176(6):532-55. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.200703-456SO. View

4.
North M, Bourne S, Green B, Chauhan A, Brown T, Winter J . A randomised controlled feasibility trial of E-health application supported care vs usual care after exacerbation of COPD: the RESCUE trial. NPJ Digit Med. 2020; 3:145. PMC: 7603326. DOI: 10.1038/s41746-020-00347-7. View

5.
Rodriguez-Roisin R . Toward a consensus definition for COPD exacerbations. Chest. 2000; 117(5 Suppl 2):398S-401S. DOI: 10.1378/chest.117.5_suppl_2.398s. View