» Articles » PMID: 37900567

Editorial: Challenges in the Contemporary Assessment of Coronary Physiology

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
References
1.
Norgaard B, Leipsic J, Gaur S, Seneviratne S, Ko B, Ito H . Diagnostic performance of noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in suspected coronary artery disease: the NXT trial (Analysis of Coronary Blood Flow Using CT Angiography: Next Steps). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014; 63(12):1145-1155. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.11.043. View

2.
Xu B, Tu S, Song L, Jin Z, Yu B, Fu G . Angiographic quantitative flow ratio-guided coronary intervention (FAVOR III China): a multicentre, randomised, sham-controlled trial. Lancet. 2021; 398(10317):2149-2159. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02248-0. View

3.
Pellicano M, Lavi I, De Bruyne B, Vaknin-Assa H, Assali A, Valtzer O . Validation Study of Image-Based Fractional Flow Reserve During Coronary Angiography. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017; 10(9). DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.005259. View

4.
Huang J, Emori H, Ding D, Kubo T, Yu W, Huang P . Diagnostic performance of intracoronary optical coherence tomography-based versus angiography-based fractional flow reserve for the evaluation of coronary lesions. EuroIntervention. 2020; 16(7):568-576. DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-19-01034. View

5.
Warisawa T, Howard J, Kawase Y, Tanigaki T, Omori H, Cook C . Difference in functional assessment of individual stenosis severity in serial coronary lesions between resting and hyperemic pressure-wire pullback: Insights from the GIFT registry. Int J Cardiol. 2020; 312:10-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.05.001. View