Editorial: Challenges in the Contemporary Assessment of Coronary Physiology
Overview
Overview
Journal
Front Cardiovasc Med
Specialty
Cardiology & Vascular Diseases
Date
2023 Oct 30
PMID
37900567
Authors
Affiliations
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
References
1.
Norgaard B, Leipsic J, Gaur S, Seneviratne S, Ko B, Ito H
. Diagnostic performance of noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in suspected coronary artery disease: the NXT trial (Analysis of Coronary Blood Flow Using CT Angiography: Next Steps). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014; 63(12):1145-1155.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.11.043.
View
2.
Xu B, Tu S, Song L, Jin Z, Yu B, Fu G
. Angiographic quantitative flow ratio-guided coronary intervention (FAVOR III China): a multicentre, randomised, sham-controlled trial. Lancet. 2021; 398(10317):2149-2159.
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02248-0.
View
3.
Pellicano M, Lavi I, De Bruyne B, Vaknin-Assa H, Assali A, Valtzer O
. Validation Study of Image-Based Fractional Flow Reserve During Coronary Angiography. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017; 10(9).
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.005259.
View
4.
Huang J, Emori H, Ding D, Kubo T, Yu W, Huang P
. Diagnostic performance of intracoronary optical coherence tomography-based versus angiography-based fractional flow reserve for the evaluation of coronary lesions. EuroIntervention. 2020; 16(7):568-576.
DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-19-01034.
View
5.
Warisawa T, Howard J, Kawase Y, Tanigaki T, Omori H, Cook C
. Difference in functional assessment of individual stenosis severity in serial coronary lesions between resting and hyperemic pressure-wire pullback: Insights from the GIFT registry. Int J Cardiol. 2020; 312:10-15.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.05.001.
View