» Articles » PMID: 37894082

A Survey of Archaeal Restriction-Modification Systems

Overview
Journal Microorganisms
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2023 Oct 28
PMID 37894082
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

When compared with bacteria, relatively little is known about the restriction-modification (RM) systems of archaea, particularly those in taxa outside of the haloarchaea. To improve our understanding of archaeal RM systems, we surveyed REBASE, the restriction enzyme database, to catalog what is known about the genes and activities present in the 519 completely sequenced archaeal genomes currently deposited there. For 49 (9.4%) of these genomes, we also have methylome data from Single-Molecule Real-Time (SMRT) sequencing that reveal the target recognition sites of the active mA and mC DNA methyltransferases (MTases). The gene-finding pipeline employed by REBASE is trained primarily on bacterial examples and so will look for similar genes in archaea. Nonetheless, the organizational structure and protein sequence of RM systems from archaea are highly similar to those of bacteria, with both groups acquiring systems from a shared genetic pool through horizontal gene transfer. As in bacteria, we observe numerous examples of "persistent" DNA MTases conserved within archaeal taxa at different levels. We experimentally validated two homologous members of one of the largest "persistent" MTase groups, revealing that methylation of C(mC)WGG sites may play a key epigenetic role in Crenarchaea. Throughout the archaea, genes encoding mA, mC, and mC DNA MTases, respectively, occur in approximately the ratio 4:2:1.

Citing Articles

Genome sequence of an extremely halophilic archaeon isolated from Permian Period halite, Salado Formation in New Mexico, USA: sp. strain NMX12-1.

Soto L, DasSarma P, Anton B, Vincze T, Verma I, Eralp B Microbiol Resour Announc. 2024; 13(11):e0077824.

PMID: 39431873 PMC: 11556058. DOI: 10.1128/mra.00778-24.

References
1.
Vaisvila R, Ponnaluri V, Sun Z, Langhorst B, Saleh L, Guan S . Enzymatic methyl sequencing detects DNA methylation at single-base resolution from picograms of DNA. Genome Res. 2021; 31(7):1280-1289. PMC: 8256858. DOI: 10.1101/gr.266551.120. View

2.
Malone T, Blumenthal R, Cheng X . Structure-guided analysis reveals nine sequence motifs conserved among DNA amino-methyltransferases, and suggests a catalytic mechanism for these enzymes. J Mol Biol. 1995; 253(4):618-32. DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1995.0577. View

3.
Oliveira P, Touchon M, Rocha E . The interplay of restriction-modification systems with mobile genetic elements and their prokaryotic hosts. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014; 42(16):10618-31. PMC: 4176335. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gku734. View

4.
Seshasayee A, Singh P, Krishna S . Context-dependent conservation of DNA methyltransferases in bacteria. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012; 40(15):7066-73. PMC: 3424554. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gks390. View

5.
Rand A, Jain M, Eizenga J, Musselman-Brown A, Olsen H, Akeson M . Mapping DNA methylation with high-throughput nanopore sequencing. Nat Methods. 2017; 14(4):411-413. PMC: 5704956. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.4189. View