Visuo-haptic Processing of Unfamiliar Shapes: Comparing Children and Adults

Overview

Journal PLoS One

Specialties General Medicine
Science

Date 2023 Oct 27

PMID 37889903

Authors

Furat AlAhmed

Anne Rau

Christian Wallraven

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The question of how our sensory perception abilities develop has been an active area of research, establishing trajectories of development from infancy that last well into late childhood and even adolescence. In this context, several studies have established changes in sensory processing of vision and touch around the age of 8 to 9 years. In this experiment, we explored the visual and haptic perceptual development of elementary school children of ages 6-11 in similarity-rating tasks of unfamiliar objects and compared their performance to adults. The participants were presented with parametrically-defined objects to be explored haptically and visually in separate groups for both children and adults. Our results showed that the raw similarity ratings of the children had more variability compared to adults. A detailed multidimensional scaling analysis revealed that the reconstructed perceptual space of the adult haptic group was significantly closer to the parameter space compared to the children group, whereas both groups' visual perceptual space was similarly well reconstructed. Beyond this, however, we found no clear evidence for an age effect in either modality within the children group. These results suggest that haptic processing of unfamiliar, abstract shapes may continue to develop beyond the age of 11 years later into adolescence.

References

Nardini M, Jones P, Bedford R, Braddick O . Development of cue integration in human navigation. Curr Biol. 2008; 18(9):689-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.04.021. View

Misceo G, HERSHBERGER W, Mancini R . Haptic estimates of discordant visual-haptic size vary developmentally. Percept Psychophys. 1999; 61(4):608-14. DOI: 10.3758/bf03205533. View

Cooke T, Jakel F, Wallraven C, Bulthoff H . Multimodal similarity and categorization of novel, three-dimensional objects. Neuropsychologia. 2006; 45(3):484-95. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.02.009. View

Kalisch T, Tegenthoff M, Dinse H . Repetitive electric stimulation elicits enduring improvement of sensorimotor performance in seniors. Neural Plast. 2010; 2010:690531. PMC: 2855030. DOI: 10.1155/2010/690531. View

Purpura G, Cioni G, Tinelli F . Development of visuo-haptic transfer for object recognition in typical preschool and school-aged children. Child Neuropsychol. 2017; 24(5):657-670. DOI: 10.1080/09297049.2017.1316974. View

Sauzeon H, Lestage P, Raboutet C, NKaoua B, Claverie B . Verbal fluency output in children aged 7-16 as a function of the production criterion: qualitative analysis of clustering, switching processes, and semantic network exploitation. Brain Lang. 2004; 89(1):192-202. DOI: 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00367-5. View

Lee Masson H, Bulthe J, Op de Beeck H, Wallraven C . Visual and Haptic Shape Processing in the Human Brain: Unisensory Processing, Multisensory Convergence, and Top-Down Influences. Cereb Cortex. 2015; 26(8):3402-3412. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhv170. View

Patterson M, Werker J . Infants' ability to match dynamic phonetic and gender information in the face and voice. J Exp Child Psychol. 2001; 81(1):93-115. DOI: 10.1006/jecp.2001.2644. View

Barutchu A, Fifer J, Shivdasani M, Crewther S, Paolini A . The Interplay Between Multisensory Associative Learning and IQ in Children. Child Dev. 2019; 91(2):620-637. DOI: 10.1111/cdev.13210. View

10.

Meinhardt-Injac B, Boutet I, Persike M, Meinhardt G, Imhof M . From development to aging: Holistic face perception in children, younger and older adults. Cognition. 2016; 158:134-146. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.10.020. View

11.

Tang H, Song R, Hu Y, Tian Y, Lu Z, Chen L . Late Development of Early Visual Perception: No Topology-Priority in Peripheral Vision Until Age 10. Child Dev. 2021; 92(5):1906-1918. PMC: 8518037. DOI: 10.1111/cdev.13629. View

12.

Wallraven C, Bulthoff H, Waterkamp S, van Dam L, Gaissert N . The eyes grasp, the hands see: metric category knowledge transfers between vision and touch. Psychon Bull Rev. 2013; 21(4):976-85. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-013-0563-4. View

13.

Hermann R, Novak C, Mackinnon S . Establishing normal values of moving two-point discrimination in children and adolescents. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1996; 38(3):255-61. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1996.tb15087.x. View

14.

Brown A, Dobson V, Maier J . Visual acuity of human infants at scotopic, mesopic and photopic luminances. Vision Res. 1987; 27(10):1845-58. DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(87)90113-1. View

15.

HERTZIG M, BIRCH H, Thomas A, Mendez O . Class and ethnic differences in the responsiveness of preschool children to cognitive demands. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1968; 33(1):1-69. View

16.

Eisenberg L, DIRKS D . Reliability and sensitivity of paired comparisons and category rating in children. J Speech Hear Res. 1995; 38(5):1157-67. DOI: 10.1044/jshr.3805.1157. View

17.

Gaissert N, Wallraven C, Bulthoff H . Visual and haptic perceptual spaces show high similarity in humans. J Vis. 2010; 10(11):2. DOI: 10.1167/10.11.2. View

18.

Reuter E, Voelcker-Rehage C, Vieluf S, Godde B . Touch perception throughout working life: effects of age and expertise. Exp Brain Res. 2011; 216(2):287-97. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-011-2931-5. View

19.

Nardini M, Bedford R, Mareschal D . Fusion of visual cues is not mandatory in children. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010; 107(39):17041-6. PMC: 2947870. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1001699107. View

20.

Droit-Volet S, Meck W, Penney T . Sensory modality and time perception in children and adults. Behav Processes. 2006; 74(2):244-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2006.09.012. View