» Articles » PMID: 37889767

The Science and Social Validity of Companion Animal Welfare: Functionally Defined Parameters in a Multidisciplinary Field

Overview
Journal Animals (Basel)
Date 2023 Oct 27
PMID 37889767
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Social validity refers to the social significance and acceptability of intervention goals, procedures, and outcomes. Animal practitioners, who are often guided by the principles of ABA, lack the benefit of verbal participants (at least with respect to target animals) with which to assess a client's needs and preferences. The study of a learner's welfare is useful for determining areas where intervention is needed or how the learner feels about an intervention that is underway. Three tenets of animal welfare measurement include physiological function, naturalistic behavior, and affect, where affect refers to private events, including emotions, which are a function of the same variables and contingencies responsible for controlling public behavior. The development of new technologies allows us to look "under the skin" and account for subjective experiences that can now be observed objectively. We introduce the reader to tools available from the animal welfare sciences for the objective measurement of social validity from the learner's perspective.

Citing Articles

Human-computer interactions with farm animals-enhancing welfare through precision livestock farming and artificial intelligence.

Neethirajan S, Scott S, Mancini C, Boivin X, Strand E Front Vet Sci. 2024; 11:1490851.

PMID: 39611113 PMC: 11604036. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1490851.


Near and Dear? If animal welfare concepts do not apply to species at a great phylogenetic distance from humans, what concepts might serve as alternatives?.

Arndt S, van der Staay F, Goerlich V Anim Welf. 2024; 33:e38.

PMID: 39464388 PMC: 11503720. DOI: 10.1017/awf.2024.36.


Unveiling Niaprazine's Potential: Behavioral Insights into a Re-Emerging Anxiolytic Agent.

Trebesova H, Monaco M, Baldassari S, Ailuno G, Lancellotti E, Caviglioli G Biomedicines. 2024; 12(9).

PMID: 39335600 PMC: 11428487. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12092087.


Evaluation of indicators of acute emotional states in dogs.

Flint H, Weller J, Parry-Howells N, Ellerby Z, McKay S, King T Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):6406.

PMID: 38493262 PMC: 10944520. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-56859-9.

References
1.
Puurunen J, Hakanen E, Salonen M, Mikkola S, Sulkama S, Araujo C . Inadequate socialisation, inactivity, and urban living environment are associated with social fearfulness in pet dogs. Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):3527. PMC: 7044223. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-60546-w. View

2.
Mogil J, Pang D, Silva Dutra G, Chambers C . The development and use of facial grimace scales for pain measurement in animals. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020; 116:480-493. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.07.013. View

3.
Panksepp J . Affective neuroscience of the emotional BrainMind: evolutionary perspectives and implications for understanding depression. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2011; 12(4):533-45. PMC: 3181986. View

4.
Salzer A, Reed D . The ideal free distribution accounts for free-operant domesticated dog foraging. J Exp Anal Behav. 2022; 118(2):327-336. DOI: 10.1002/jeab.785. View

5.
Bremhorst A, Sutter N, Wurbel H, Mills D, Riemer S . Differences in facial expressions during positive anticipation and frustration in dogs awaiting a reward. Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):19312. PMC: 6917793. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-55714-6. View