» Articles » PMID: 21319497

Affective Neuroscience of the Emotional BrainMind: Evolutionary Perspectives and Implications for Understanding Depression

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2011 Feb 16
PMID 21319497
Citations 56
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Cross-species affective neuroscience studies confirm that primary-process emotional feelings are organized within primitive subcortical regions of the brain that are anatomically, neurochemically, and functionally homologous in all mammals that have been studied. Emotional feelings (affects) are intrinsic values that inform animals how they are faring in the quest to survive. The various positive affects indicate that animals are returning to "comfort zones" that support survival, and negative affects reflect "discomfort zones" that indicate that animals are in situations that may impair survival. They are ancestral tools for living--evolutionary memories of such importance that they were coded into the genome in rough form (as primary brain processes), which are refined by basic learning mechanisms (secondary processes) as well as by higher-order cognitions/thoughts (tertiary processes). To understand why depression feels horrible, we must fathom the affective infrastructure of the mammalian brain. Advances in our understanding of the nature of primary-process emotional affects can promote the development of better preclinical models of psychiatric disorders and thereby also allow clinicians new and useful ways to understand the foundational aspects of their clients' problems. These networks are of clear importance for understanding psychiatric disorders and advancing psychiatric practice.

Citing Articles

Psychological assessment and support in functional neurological disorder: a longitudinal study.

Radin Y, Bulfon M, Caruso P, Barbi E, Manganotti P, Clarici A Front Psychol. 2025; 16:1506069.

PMID: 39995429 PMC: 11847828. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1506069.


Depression in adolescence and young adulthood: the difficulty to integrate motivational/emotional systems.

Giacolini T, Alcaro A, Conversi D, Tarsitani L Front Psychol. 2025; 15():1391664.

PMID: 39834756 PMC: 11743547. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1391664.


The role of dynamic shape cues in the recognition of emotion from naturalistic body motion.

Ikeda E, Destler N, Feldman J Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025; 87(2):604-618.

PMID: 39821558 DOI: 10.3758/s13414-024-02990-8.


Basic Affective Systems and Sex Differences in the Relationship between Anger and Fear.

Manfredi P Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024; 21(10).

PMID: 39457239 PMC: 11507658. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21101266.


Playfulness and adolescence: mentalization and neuropsychoanalysis perspective.

Kolev M Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1371747.

PMID: 38933595 PMC: 11201137. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1371747.


References
1.
Panksepp J, Knutson B, Burgdorf J . The role of brain emotional systems in addictions: a neuro-evolutionary perspective and new 'self-report' animal model. Addiction. 2002; 97(4):459-69. DOI: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2002.00025.x. View

2.
Cannon W . The James-Lange theory of emotions: a critical examination and an alternative theory. By Walter B. Cannon, 1927. Am J Psychol. 1987; 100(3-4):567-86. View

3.
Panksepp J . Affective consciousness: Core emotional feelings in animals and humans. Conscious Cogn. 2005; 14(1):30-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2004.10.004. View

4.
Harro J, Oreland L . Depression as a spreading adjustment disorder of monoaminergic neurons: a case for primary implication of the locus coeruleus. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 2001; 38(1-2):79-128. DOI: 10.1016/s0165-0173(01)00082-0. View

5.
Zellner M, Watt D, Solms M, Panksepp J . Affective neuroscientific and neuropsychoanalytic approaches to two intractable psychiatric problems: why depression feels so bad and what addicts really want. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2011; 35(9):2000-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.01.003. View