» Articles » PMID: 37876272

Lumped Parameter Liver Simulation to Predict Acute Haemodynamic Alterations Following Partial Resections

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Partial liver resections are routinely performed in living donor liver transplantation and to debulk tumours in liver malignancies, but surgical decisions on vessel reconstruction for adequate inflow and outflow are challenging. Pre-operative evaluation is often limited to radiological imaging, which fails to account for post-resection haemodynamic alterations. Substantial evidence suggests post-surgical increase in local volume flow rate enhances shear stress, signalling hepatic regeneration, but excessive shear stress has been postulated to result in small for size syndrome and liver failure. Predicting haemodynamic alterations throughout the liver is particularly challenging due to the dendritic architecture of the vasculature, spanning several orders of magnitude in diameter. Therefore, we developed a mathematical lumped parameter model with realistic heterogeneities capturing inflow/outflow of the human liver to simulate acute perfusion alterations following surgical resection. Our model is parametrized using clinical measurements, relies on a single free parameter and accurately captures established perfusion characteristics. We quantify acute changes in volume flow rate, flow speed and wall shear stress following variable, realistic liver resections and make comparisons with the intact liver. Our numerical model runs in minutes and can be adapted to patient-specific anatomy, providing a novel computational tool aimed at assisting pre- and intra-operative surgical decisions for liver resections.

Citing Articles

A simplified computational liver perfusion model, with applications to organ preservation.

Emerson D, Rabin Y, Kara L Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):2178.

PMID: 39820266 PMC: 11739513. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-85170-4.


Lumped parameter liver simulation to predict acute haemodynamic alterations following partial resections.

Tithof J, Pruett T, Rao J J R Soc Interface. 2023; 20(207):20230444.

PMID: 37876272 PMC: 10598422. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2023.0444.

References
1.
Mise Y, Sakamoto Y, Ishizawa T, Kaneko J, Aoki T, Hasegawa K . A worldwide survey of the current daily practice in liver surgery. Liver Cancer. 2013; 2(1):55-66. PMC: 3747552. DOI: 10.1159/000346225. View

2.
Reif R, Ghallab A, Beattie L, Gunther G, Kuepfer L, Kaye P . In vivo imaging of systemic transport and elimination of xenobiotics and endogenous molecules in mice. Arch Toxicol. 2016; 91(3):1335-1352. PMC: 5316407. DOI: 10.1007/s00204-016-1906-5. View

3.
Deal R, Frederiks C, Williams L, Olthof P, Dirscherl K, Keutgen X . Rapid Liver Hypertrophy After Portal Vein Occlusion Correlates with the Degree of Collateralization Between Lobes-a Study in Pigs. J Gastrointest Surg. 2017; 22(2):203-213. DOI: 10.1007/s11605-017-3512-0. View

4.
Golse N, Joly F, Combari P, Lewin M, Nicolas Q, Audebert C . Predicting the risk of post-hepatectomy portal hypertension using a digital twin: A clinical proof of concept. J Hepatol. 2020; 74(3):661-669. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.10.036. View

5.
Hanson K . Dilator responses of the canine hepatic vasculature. Angiologica. 1973; 10(1):15-23. DOI: 10.1159/000157956. View