LesSDRF is More: Maximizing the Value of Proteomics Data Through Streamlined Metadata Annotation

Overview

Journal Nat Commun

Specialty Biology

Date 2023 Oct 24

PMID 37875519

Authors

Tine Claeys

Tim Van Den Bossche

Yasset Perez-Riverol

Kris Gevaert

Juan Antonio Vizcaino

Lennart Martens

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Public proteomics data often lack essential metadata, limiting its potential. To address this, we present lesSDRF, a tool to simplify the process of metadata annotation, thereby ensuring that data leave a lasting, impactful legacy well beyond its initial publication.

Citing Articles

Proteome-wide non-cleavable crosslink identification with MS Annika 3.0 reveals the structure of the C. elegans Box C/D complex.

Birklbauer M, Muller F, Sivakumar Geetha S, Matzinger M, Mechtler K, Dorfer V Commun Chem. 2024; 7(1):300.

PMID: 39702463 PMC: 11659399. DOI: 10.1038/s42004-024-01386-x.

ProHap enables human proteomic database generation accounting for population diversity.

Vasicek J, Kuznetsova K, Skiadopoulou D, Unger L, Chera S, Ghila L Nat Methods. 2024; 22(2):273-277.

PMID: 39653819 DOI: 10.1038/s41592-024-02506-0.

Proteomics Can Rise to the Challenge of Pseudogenes' Coding Nature.

Vasylieva V, Arefiev I, Bourassa F, Trifiro F, Brunet M J Proteome Res. 2024; 23(12):5233-5249.

PMID: 39486438 PMC: 11629383. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.4c00116.

What is the real value of omics data? Enhancing research outcomes and securing long-term data excellence.

Price E, Feyertag F, Evans T, Miskin J, Mitrophanous K, Dikicioglu D Nucleic Acids Res. 2024; 52(20):12130-12140.

PMID: 39417504 PMC: 11551742. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkae901.

Data-Independent Acquisition Mass Spectrometry as a Tool for Metaproteomics: Interlaboratory Comparison Using a Model Microbiome.

Rajczewski A, Blakeley-Ruiz J, Meyer A, Vintila S, McIlvin M, Van Den Bossche T bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39345414 PMC: 11430069. DOI: 10.1101/2024.09.18.613707.

References

Kong A, Leprevost F, Avtonomov D, Mellacheruvu D, Nesvizhskii A . MSFragger: ultrafast and comprehensive peptide identification in mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nat Methods. 2017; 14(5):513-520. PMC: 5409104. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.4256. View

Hulstaert N, Reisinger F, Rameseder J, Barsnes H, Vizcaino J, Martens L . Pride-asap: automatic fragment ion annotation of identified PRIDE spectra. J Proteomics. 2013; 95:89-92. PMC: 4085470. DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2013.04.011. View

Tunyasuvunakool K, Adler J, Wu Z, Green T, Zielinski M, Zidek A . Highly accurate protein structure prediction for the human proteome. Nature. 2021; 596(7873):590-596. PMC: 8387240. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-03828-1. View

Perez-Riverol Y, Zorin A, Dass G, Vu M, Xu P, Glont M . Quantifying the impact of public omics data. Nat Commun. 2019; 10(1):3512. PMC: 6683138. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-11461-w. View

Goeminne L, Sticker A, Martens L, Gevaert K, Clement L . MSqRob Takes the Missing Hurdle: Uniting Intensity- and Count-Based Proteomics. Anal Chem. 2020; 92(9):6278-6287. DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b04375. View

Perkins D, Pappin D, Creasy D, Cottrell J . Probability-based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data. Electrophoresis. 1999; 20(18):3551-67. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2683(19991201)20:18<3551::AID-ELPS3551>3.0.CO;2-2. View

Choi M, Chang C, Clough T, Broudy D, Killeen T, MacLean B . MSstats: an R package for statistical analysis of quantitative mass spectrometry-based proteomic experiments. Bioinformatics. 2014; 30(17):2524-6. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu305. View

Claeys T, Van Den Bossche T, Perez-Riverol Y, Gevaert K, Vizcaino J, Martens L . lesSDRF is more: maximizing the value of proteomics data through streamlined metadata annotation. Nat Commun. 2023; 14(1):6743. PMC: 10598006. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-42543-5. View

Gessulat S, Schmidt T, Zolg D, Samaras P, Schnatbaum K, Zerweck J . Prosit: proteome-wide prediction of peptide tandem mass spectra by deep learning. Nat Methods. 2019; 16(6):509-518. DOI: 10.1038/s41592-019-0426-7. View

10.

Griss J, Perez-Riverol Y, Hermjakob H, Vizcaino J . Identifying novel biomarkers through data mining-a realistic scenario?. Proteomics Clin Appl. 2014; 9(3-4):437-43. PMC: 4833187. DOI: 10.1002/prca.201400107. View

11.

Bhandary P, Seetharam A, Arendsee Z, Hur M, Syrkin Wurtele E . Raising orphans from a metadata morass: A researcher's guide to re-use of public 'omics data. Plant Sci. 2018; 267:32-47. DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2017.10.014. View

12.

Berman H, Kleywegt G, Nakamura H, Markley J . The Protein Data Bank archive as an open data resource. J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2014; 28(10):1009-14. PMC: 4196035. DOI: 10.1007/s10822-014-9770-y. View

13.

Dai C, Fullgrabe A, Pfeuffer J, Solovyeva E, Deng J, Moreno P . A proteomics sample metadata representation for multiomics integration and big data analysis. Nat Commun. 2021; 12(1):5854. PMC: 8494749. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-26111-3. View

14.

Martens L, Vizcaino J . A Golden Age for Working with Public Proteomics Data. Trends Biochem Sci. 2017; 42(5):333-341. PMC: 5414595. DOI: 10.1016/j.tibs.2017.01.001. View

15.

Bouwmeester R, Gabriels R, Hulstaert N, Martens L, Degroeve S . DeepLC can predict retention times for peptides that carry as-yet unseen modifications. Nat Methods. 2021; 18(11):1363-1369. DOI: 10.1038/s41592-021-01301-5. View

16.

Van Den Bossche T, Arntzen M, Becher D, Benndorf D, Eijsink V, Henry C . The Metaproteomics Initiative: a coordinated approach for propelling the functional characterization of microbiomes. Microbiome. 2021; 9(1):243. PMC: 8690404. DOI: 10.1186/s40168-021-01176-w. View

17.

Degroeve S, Martens L . MS2PIP: a tool for MS/MS peak intensity prediction. Bioinformatics. 2013; 29(24):3199-203. PMC: 5994937. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt544. View

18.

Martens L . Public proteomics data: How the field has evolved from sceptical inquiry to the promise of proteomics. EuPA Open Proteom. 2018; 11:42-44. PMC: 5988554. DOI: 10.1016/j.euprot.2016.02.005. View