» Articles » PMID: 37855304

Performance of a Novel Artificial Intelligence Software Developed to Derive Coronary Fractional Flow Reserve Values from Diagnostic Angiograms

Abstract

Background: Although invasive measurement of fractional flow reserve (FFR) is recommended to guide revascularization, its routine use is underutilized. Recently, a novel non-invasive software that can instantaneously produce FFR values from the diagnostic angiograms, derived completely from artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms has been developed. We aim to assess the accuracy and diagnostic performance of AI-FFR in a real-world retrospective study.

Methods: Retrospective, three-center study comparing AI-FFR values with invasive pressure wire-derived FFR obtained in patients undergoing routine diagnostic angiography. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of AI-FFR were analyzed.

Results: A total of 304 vessels from 297 patients were included. Mean invasive FFR was 0.86 vs. 0.85 AI-FFR (mean difference: -0.005, P  = 0.159). The diagnostic performance of AI-FFR demonstrated sensitivity of 91%, specificity 95%, positive predictive value 83% and negative predictive value 97%. Overall accuracy was 94% and the area under curve was 0.93 (95% CI 0.88-0.97). 105 lesions fell around the cutoff value (FFR = 0.75-0.85); in this sub-group, AI-FFR demonstrated sensitivity of 95%, and specificity 94%, with an AUC of 0.94 (95% CI 88.2-98.0). AI-FFR calculation time was 37.5 ± 7.4 s for each angiographic video. In 89% of cases, the software located the target lesion and in 11%, the operator manually marked the target lesion.

Conclusion: AI-FFR calculated by an AI-based, angio-derived method, demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance against invasive FFR. AI-FFR calculation was fast with high reproducibility.

Citing Articles

Enhancing quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) with advanced artificial intelligence: comparison with manual QCA and visual estimation.

Chae J, Kweon J, Park G, Park S, Yoon H, Lee C Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2025; 41(3):559-568.

PMID: 39875702 PMC: 11880186. DOI: 10.1007/s10554-025-03342-9.


Coronary angiography: a review of the state of the art and the evolution of angiography in cardio therapeutics.

Gurav A, Revaiah P, Tsai T, Miyashita K, Tobe A, Oshima A Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 11:1468888.

PMID: 39654943 PMC: 11625592. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1468888.


Old Habits Die Hard: Can AI Help Bring Coronary Angiography Into the 21st Century?.

Nobre Menezes M, Oliveira C, Silva J, Silva B, Silva Marques J, Guerreiro C JACC Adv. 2024; 3(8):101093.

PMID: 39055273 PMC: 11269275. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.101093.

References
1.
Scoccia A, Tomaniak M, Neleman T, Groenland F, Ziedses des Plantes A, Daemen J . Angiography-Based Fractional Flow Reserve: State of the Art. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2022; 24(6):667-678. PMC: 9188492. DOI: 10.1007/s11886-022-01687-4. View

2.
Morris P, Curzen N, Gunn J . Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve: More or Less Physiology?. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020; 9(6):e015586. PMC: 7335504. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.119.015586. View

3.
Xu B, Tu S, Song L, Jin Z, Yu B, Fu G . Angiographic quantitative flow ratio-guided coronary intervention (FAVOR III China): a multicentre, randomised, sham-controlled trial. Lancet. 2021; 398(10317):2149-2159. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02248-0. View

4.
Johnson N, Li W, Chen X, Hennigan B, Watkins S, Berry C . Diastolic pressure ratio: new approach and validation vs. the instantaneous wave-free ratio. Eur Heart J. 2019; 40(31):2585-2594. PMC: 6692701. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz230. View

5.
Lawton J, Tamis-Holland J, Bangalore S, Bates E, Beckie T, Bischoff J . 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Coronary Artery Revascularization: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021; 79(2):197-215. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.09.005. View