» Articles » PMID: 37850941

Two Years with a Tubeless Automated Insulin Delivery System: A Single-Arm Multicenter Trial in Children, Adolescents, and Adults with Type 1 Diabetes

Abstract

The Omnipod 5 Automated Insulin Delivery (AID) System was shown to be safe and effective following 3 months of use in people with type 1 diabetes (T1D); however, data on the durability of these results are limited. This study evaluated the long-term safety and effectiveness of Omnipod 5 use in people with T1D during up to 2 years of use. After a 3-month single-arm, multicenter, pivotal trial in children (6-13.9 years) and adolescents/adults (14-70 years), participants could continue system use in an extension phase. HbA1c was measured every 3 months for up to 15 months; continuous glucose monitor metrics were collected for up to 2 years. Participants ( = 224) completed median (interquartile range) 22.3 (21.7, 22.7) months of AID. HbA1c was reduced in the pivotal trial from 7.7% ± 0.9% in children and 7.2% ± 0.9% in adolescents/adults to 7.0% ± 0.6% and 6.8% ± 0.7%, respectively, ( < 0.0001), and was maintained at 7.2% ± 0.7% and 6.9% ± 0.6% after 15 months ( < 0.0001 from baseline). Time in target range (70-180 mg/dL) increased from 52.4% ± 15.6% in children and 63.6% ± 16.5% in adolescents/adults at baseline to 67.9% ± 8.0% and 73.8% ± 10.8%, respectively, during the pivotal trial ( < 0.0001) and was maintained at 65.9% ± 8.9% and 72.9% ± 11.3% during the extension ( < 0.0001 from baseline). One episode of diabetic ketoacidosis and seven episodes of severe hypoglycemia occurred during the extension. Children and adolescents/adults spent median 96.1% and 96.3% of time in Automated Mode, respectively. Our study supports that long-term use of the Omnipod 5 AID System can safely maintain improvements in glycemic outcomes for up to 2 years of use in people with T1D. NCT04196140.

Citing Articles

Efficacy and Safety of a Tubeless AID System Compared With Pump Therapy With CGM in the Treatment of Type 1 Diabetes in Adults With Suboptimal Glycemia: A Randomized, Parallel-Group Clinical Trial.

Renard E, Weinstock R, Aleppo G, Bode B, Brown S, Castorino K Diabetes Care. 2024; 47(12):2248-2257.

PMID: 39423118 PMC: 11655411. DOI: 10.2337/dc24-1550.


Enhancing equity in access to automated insulin delivery systems in an ethnically and socioeconomically diverse group of children with type 1 diabetes.

Pemberton J, Collins L, Drummond L, Dias R, Krone R, Kershaw M BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2024; 12(3).

PMID: 38749509 PMC: 11097826. DOI: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2024-004045.

References
1.
Phillip M, Nimri R, Bergenstal R, Barnard-Kelly K, Danne T, Hovorka R . Consensus Recommendations for the Use of Automated Insulin Delivery Technologies in Clinical Practice. Endocr Rev. 2022; 44(2):254-280. PMC: 9985411. DOI: 10.1210/endrev/bnac022. View

2.
Akturk H, Giordano D, Champakanath A, Brackett S, Garg S, Snell-Bergeon J . Long-term real-life glycaemic outcomes with a hybrid closed-loop system compared with sensor-augmented pump therapy in patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019; 22(4):583-589. DOI: 10.1111/dom.13933. View

3.
Boughton C, Allen J, Ware J, Wilinska M, Hartnell S, Thankamony A . Closed-Loop Therapy and Preservation of C-Peptide Secretion in Type 1 Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2022; 387(10):882-893. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2203496. View

4.
Petrovski G, Al Khalaf F, Campbell J, Umer F, Almajaly D, Hamdan M . One-year experience of hybrid closed-loop system in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes previously treated with multiple daily injections: drivers to successful outcomes. Acta Diabetol. 2020; 58(2):207-213. PMC: 7548407. DOI: 10.1007/s00592-020-01607-4. View

5.
Ware J, Boughton C, Allen J, Wilinska M, Tauschmann M, Denvir L . Cambridge hybrid closed-loop algorithm in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: a multicentre 6-month randomised controlled trial. Lancet Digit Health. 2022; 4(4):e245-e255. DOI: 10.1016/S2589-7500(22)00020-6. View