» Articles » PMID: 34099518

Multicenter Trial of a Tubeless, On-Body Automated Insulin Delivery System With Customizable Glycemic Targets in Pediatric and Adult Participants With Type 1 Diabetes

Abstract

Objective: Advances in diabetes technology have transformed the treatment paradigm for type 1 diabetes, yet the burden of disease is significant. We report on a pivotal safety study of the first tubeless, on-body automated insulin delivery system with customizable glycemic targets.

Research Design And Methods: This single-arm, multicenter, prospective study enrolled 112 children (age 6-13.9 years) and 129 adults (age 14-70 years). A 2-week standard therapy phase (usual insulin regimen) was followed by 3 months of automated insulin delivery. Primary safety outcomes were incidence of severe hypoglycemia and diabetic ketoacidosis. Primary effectiveness outcomes were change in HbA and percent time in sensor glucose range 70-180 mg/dL ("time in range").

Results: A total of 235 participants (98% of enrolled, including 111 children and 124 adults) completed the study. HbA was significantly reduced in children by 0.71% (7.8 mmol/mol) (mean ± SD: 7.67 ± 0.95% to 6.99 ± 0.63% [60 ± 10.4 mmol/mol to 53 ± 6.9 mmol/mol], < 0.0001) and in adults by 0.38% (4.2 mmol/mol) (7.16 ± 0.86% to 6.78 ± 0.68% [55 ± 9.4 mmol/mol to 51 ± 7.4 mmol/mol], < 0.0001). Time in range was improved from standard therapy by 15.6 ± 11.5% or 3.7 h/day in children and 9.3 ± 11.8% or 2.2 h/day in adults (both < 0.0001). This was accomplished with a reduction in time in hypoglycemia <70 mg/dL among adults (median [interquartile range]: 2.00% [0.63, 4.06] to 1.09% [0.46, 1.75], < 0.0001), while this parameter remained the same in children. There were three severe hypoglycemia events not attributable to automated insulin delivery malfunction and one diabetic ketoacidosis event from an infusion site failure.

Conclusions: This tubeless automated insulin delivery system was safe and allowed participants to significantly improve HbA levels and time in target glucose range with a very low occurrence of hypoglycemia.

Citing Articles

Automated Insulin Delivery in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.

Pasquel F, Davis G, Huffman D, Peters A, Parker J, Laffel L JAMA Netw Open. 2025; 8(2):e2459348.

PMID: 39951268 PMC: 11829226. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.59348.


Progression of Diabetic Retinopathy After Initiation of Automated Insulin Delivery System in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes.

Karakus K, Akturk H, Snell-Bergeon J, Shah V J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2025; :19322968251318740.

PMID: 39950376 PMC: 11831613. DOI: 10.1177/19322968251318740.


A Performance-Based Adaptation Index for Automated Insulin Delivery Systems.

Diaz C J, Colmegna P, Pryor E, Breton M J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2025; :19322968251315499.

PMID: 39910927 PMC: 11803600. DOI: 10.1177/19322968251315499.


Predictors of glycaemic improvement in children and young adults with type 1 diabetes and very elevated HbA1c using the MiniMed 780G system.

Zhou Y, Boucsein A, Michaels V, Gray M, Jefferies C, Wiltshire E Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025; 27(4):2138-2146.

PMID: 39831344 PMC: 11885095. DOI: 10.1111/dom.16210.


Subcutaneous weekly semaglutide with automated insulin delivery in type 1 diabetes: a double-blind, randomized, crossover trial.

Pasqua M, Tsoukas M, Kobayati A, Aboznadah W, Jafar A, Haidar A Nat Med. 2025; .

PMID: 39794615 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-024-03463-z.


References
1.
Nathan D, Genuth S, Lachin J, Cleary P, Crofford O, Davis M . The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1993; 329(14):977-86. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199309303291401. View

2.
Forlenza G, Pinhas-Hamiel O, Liljenquist D, Shulman D, Bailey T, Bode B . Safety Evaluation of the MiniMed 670G System in Children 7-13 Years of Age with Type 1 Diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2018; 21(1):11-19. PMC: 6350071. DOI: 10.1089/dia.2018.0264. View

3.
Buckingham B, Forlenza G, Pinsker J, Christiansen M, Wadwa R, Schneider J . Safety and Feasibility of the OmniPod Hybrid Closed-Loop System in Adult, Adolescent, and Pediatric Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Using a Personalized Model Predictive Control Algorithm. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2018; 20(4):257-262. PMC: 5910038. DOI: 10.1089/dia.2017.0346. View

4.
Breton M, Kanapka L, Beck R, Ekhlaspour L, Forlenza G, Cengiz E . A Randomized Trial of Closed-Loop Control in Children with Type 1 Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2020; 383(9):836-845. PMC: 7920146. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2004736. View

5.
Miller K, Foster N, Beck R, Bergenstal R, DuBose S, DiMeglio L . Current state of type 1 diabetes treatment in the U.S.: updated data from the T1D Exchange clinic registry. Diabetes Care. 2015; 38(6):971-8. DOI: 10.2337/dc15-0078. View