» Articles » PMID: 37847469

A Spatiotemporal and Multisensory Approach to Designing Wearable Clinical ICU Alarms

Overview
Journal J Med Syst
Date 2023 Oct 17
PMID 37847469
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In health care, auditory alarms are an important aspect of an informatics system that monitors patients and alerts clinicians attending to multiple concurrent tasks. However, the volume, design, and pervasiveness of existing Intensive Care Unit (ICU) alarms can make it difficult to quickly distinguish their meaning and importance. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of two design approaches not yet explored in a smartwatch-based alarm system designed for ICU use: (1) using audiovisual spatial colocalization and (2) adding haptic (i.e., touch) information. We compared the performance of 30 study participants using ICU smartwatch alarms containing auditory icons in two implementations of the audio modality: colocalized with the visual cue on the smartwatch's low-quality speaker versus delivered from a higher quality speaker located two feet away from participants (like a stationary alarm bay situated near patients in the ICU). Additionally, we compared participant performance using alarms with two sensory modalities (visual and audio) against alarms with three sensory modalities (adding haptic cues). Participants were 10.1% (0.24s) faster at responding to alarms when auditory information was delivered from the smartwatch instead of the higher quality external speaker. Meanwhile, adding haptic information to alarms improved response times to alarms by 12.2% (0.23s) and response times on their primary task by 10.3% (0.08s). Participants rated learnability and ease of use higher for alarms with haptic information. These small but statistically significant improvements demonstrate that audiovisual colocalization and multisensory alarm design can improve user response times.

Citing Articles

Why Clinicians should Care about YouCare and Other Wearable Health Devices.

Padiyath A, Pratap J, Simpao A J Med Syst. 2024; 48(1):104.

PMID: 39546076 DOI: 10.1007/s10916-024-02123-6.

References
1.
Johansson L, Bergbom I, Persson Waye K, Ryherd E, Lindahl B . The sound environment in an ICU patient room--a content analysis of sound levels and patient experiences. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2012; 28(5):269-79. DOI: 10.1016/j.iccn.2012.03.004. View

2.
Darbyshire J, Muller-Trapet M, Cheer J, Fazi F, Young J . Mapping sources of noise in an intensive care unit. Anaesthesia. 2019; 74(8):1018-1025. PMC: 6767712. DOI: 10.1111/anae.14690. View

3.
Simpao A, Rehman M . Anesthesia Information Management Systems. Anesth Analg. 2017; 127(1):90-94. DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002545. View

4.
Simpao A, Nelson O, Ahumada L . Automated anesthesia artifact analysis: can machines be trained to take out the garbage?. J Clin Monit Comput. 2020; 35(2):225-227. DOI: 10.1007/s10877-020-00589-6. View

5.
Miles M, Mueller D, Gay-Betton D, Baum Miller S, Massa S, Shi Y . Observational Study of Clinician Attentional Reserves (OSCAR): Acuity-Based Rounds Help Preserve Clinicians' Attention. Crit Care Med. 2020; 48(4):507-514. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004205. View