» Articles » PMID: 37827725

Immunogenicity, Safety, Usability and Acceptability of Microarray Patches for Vaccination: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal BMJ Glob Health
Specialty Public Health
Date 2023 Oct 12
PMID 37827725
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Microarray patches (MAPs) deliver vaccines to the epidermis and the upper dermis, where abundant immune cells reside. There are several potential benefits to using MAPs, including reduced sharps risk, thermostability, no need for reconstitution, tolerability and self-administration. We aimed to explore and evaluate the immunogenicity, safety, usability and acceptability of MAPs for vaccination.

Methods: We searched CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Ovid Embase, Ovid MEDLINE and Web of Science from inception to January 2023. Eligibility criteria included all research studies in any language, which examined microarrays or microneedles intended or used for vaccination and explored immunogenicity, safety, usability or acceptability in their findings. Two reviewers conducted title and abstract screening, full-text reviewing and data extraction.

Results: Twenty-two studies were included (quantitative=15, qualitative=2 and mixed methods=5). The risk of bias was mostly low, with two studies at high risk of bias. Four clinical trials were included, three using influenza antigens and one with Japanese encephalitis delivered by MAP. A meta-analysis indicated similar or higher immunogenicity in influenza MAPs compared with needle and syringe (N&S) (standardised mean difference=10.80, 95% CI: 3.51 to 18.08, p<0.00001). There were no significant differences in immune cell function between MAPs and N&S. No serious adverse events were reported in MAPs. Erythema was more common after MAP application than N&S but was brief and well tolerated. Lower pain scores were usually reported after MAP application than N&S. Most studies found MAPs easy to use and highly acceptable among healthcare professionals, laypeople and parents.

Conclusion: MAPs for vaccination were safe and well tolerated and evoked similar or enhanced immunogenicity than N&S, but further research is needed. Vaccine uptake may be increased using MAPs due to less pain, enhanced thermostability, layperson and self-administration. MAPs could benefit at-risk groups and low and middle-income countries.

Prospero Registration Number: CRD42022323026.

Citing Articles

A Pilot Open-Label Randomized Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Acceptability of the IntegriMedical® Needle Free Injection System versus a Conventional Needle-Based System in Healthy Volunteers, Using Normal Saline as a Placebo.

Pathan A, Shetty Narasimha K, Naik A, Ranade A Med Devices (Auckl). 2025; 17:525-536.

PMID: 39742081 PMC: 11687312. DOI: 10.2147/MDER.S491883.


An Application of an Initial Full Value of Vaccine Assessment Methodology to Measles-Rubella MAPs for Use in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.

Ko M, Frivold C, Mvundura M, Soble A, Gregory C, Christiansen H Vaccines (Basel). 2024; 12(9).

PMID: 39340105 PMC: 11435702. DOI: 10.3390/vaccines12091075.


The Relationship between Immunogenicity and Reactogenicity of Seasonal Influenza Vaccine Using Different Delivery Methods.

Gromer D, Plikaytis B, McCullough M, Wimalasena S, Rouphael N Vaccines (Basel). 2024; 12(7).

PMID: 39066447 PMC: 11281354. DOI: 10.3390/vaccines12070809.


Developing and validating a scale to measure the perceptions of safety, usability and acceptability of microarray patches for vaccination: a study protocol.

Berger M, Davies C, Mathieu E, Shaban R, Bag S, Skinner S Ther Adv Vaccines Immunother. 2024; 12:25151355241263560.

PMID: 39044997 PMC: 11265248. DOI: 10.1177/25151355241263560.


Immunogenicity, safety, usability and acceptability of microarray patches for vaccination: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Berger M, Mowbray E, Farag M, Mathieu E, Davies C, Thomas C BMJ Glob Health. 2023; 8(10).

PMID: 37827725 PMC: 10583062. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012247.

References
1.
Palucka K, Banchereau J, Mellman I . Designing vaccines based on biology of human dendritic cell subsets. Immunity. 2010; 33(4):464-78. PMC: 2975953. DOI: 10.1016/j.immuni.2010.10.007. View

2.
Ayala G, Elder J . Qualitative methods to ensure acceptability of behavioral and social interventions to the target population. J Public Health Dent. 2011; 71 Suppl 1:S69-79. PMC: 3758883. DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.2011.00241.x. View

3.
Frew P, Paine M, Rouphael N, Schamel J, Chung Y, Mulligan M . Acceptability of an inactivated influenza vaccine delivered by microneedle patch: Results from a phase I clinical trial of safety, reactogenicity, and immunogenicity. Vaccine. 2020; 38(45):7175-7181. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.07.064. View

4.
Seaman C, Mvundura M, Frivold C, Morgan C, Jarrahian C, Howell J . Evaluating the potential cost-effectiveness of microarray patches to expand access to hepatitis B birth dose vaccination in low-and middle-income countries: A modelling study. PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023; 2(5):e0000394. PMC: 10021446. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000394. View

5.
Fernando G, Hickling J, Jayashi Flores C, Griffin P, Anderson C, Skinner S . Safety, tolerability, acceptability and immunogenicity of an influenza vaccine delivered to human skin by a novel high-density microprojection array patch (Nanopatch™). Vaccine. 2018; 36(26):3779-3788. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.05.053. View