» Articles » PMID: 37814616

Investigation of the Effect of Vitamin K1 Prophylaxis on Newborn Screenings Tests in Newborns

Overview
Journal J Med Biochem
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 2023 Oct 10
PMID 37814616
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Routine screening for hereditary disorders in newborns includes screening for treatable metabolic and endocrine disorders, such as biotidinase deficiency, galactosemia, maple syrup urine disease, hypothyroidism, and cystic fibrosis. Incorrect test results may be encountered due to the use of vitamin K1. To investigate the interference effect of vitamin K1 on neonatal screening tests and to raise awareness of erroneous measurements.

Methods: Heel blood samples were taken from 25 newborns born in a neonatal intensive care unit. Dry blood C0, C2, C3, C4, C4DC, C5:1, C5OH, C5DC, C6, C6DC, C8, C8:1, C8DC, C10, C10:1, C10DC, C12, C14, C14:1, C14:2, C16, C16:1, C18, C18:1, C18:2, C18:OH, methylglutaryl, valine, leucine/isoleucine, methionine, phenylalanine, argininosuccinic acid, aspartate, alanine, arginine, citrulline, glycine, ornithine, and glutamate tests were studied using the tandem mass spectrometry (MS) method. The results of the heel blood samples obtained before and after the application of vitamin K1 (Phyto menadione) were compared.

Results: In two studies conducted with in vitro and in vivo tests, C0, C2, C3, C4, C4DC, C5, C5OH, C6, C8, C10, C10:1, C14, C16, C16:1, C18, C18:1, methylglutaryl, phenylalanine, argininosuccinic acid, tyrosine, aspartate, arginine, citrulline, glycine, and glutamine were all significantly elevated (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: Heel blood samples may yield false results due to vitamin K1 administration. In the case of doubtful results, a new sample should be taken and the measurement should be repeated.

References
1.
Samarasinghe S, Meah F, Singh V, Basit A, Emanuele N, Emanuele M . BIOTIN INTERFERENCE WITH ROUTINE CLINICAL IMMUNOASSAYS: UNDERSTAND THE CAUSES AND MITIGATE THE RISKS. Endocr Pract. 2017; 23(8):989-998. DOI: 10.4158/EP171761.RA. View

2.
Pehlivan V, Gonel A, Pehlivan B, Koyuncu I . False Laboratory Test Result Through Colistin Interference in an Intensive Care Patient: Case Report. Comb Chem High Throughput Screen. 2020; 23(8):827-831. DOI: 10.2174/1386207323666200514072705. View

3.
Cunniff J, Vouros P . False positives and the detection of cyclodextrin inclusion complexes by electrospray mass spectrometry. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2013; 6(5):437-47. DOI: 10.1016/1044-0305(95)00053-G. View

4.
Chun K . Biotin Interference in Diagnostic Tests. Clin Chem. 2017; 63(2):619-620. DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2016.267286. View

5.
Souverain S, Rudaz S, Veuthey J . Matrix effect in LC-ESI-MS and LC-APCI-MS with off-line and on-line extraction procedures. J Chromatogr A. 2004; 1058(1-2):61-6. View