» Articles » PMID: 10891024

The Magnitude and Challenge of False-positive Newborn Screening Test Results

Overview
Specialty Pediatrics
Date 2000 Jul 13
PMID 10891024
Citations 42
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: This study examined for the first time to our knowledge the national data available from newborn screening programs in the United States and determined the salient characteristics of various screening tests for 3 hereditary metabolic disorders and 2 congenital endocrinopathies with emphasis on positive predictive values (PPVs) to delineate the magnitude of false-positive results.

Methods: Reports published by the Council of Regional Networks for Genetic Services for 1990 through 1994 were examined carefully, paying particular attention to phenylketonuria, galactosemia, biotinidase deficiency, congenital hypothyroidism, and congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH). Because of recent improvements in data collecting, reporting, and tabulating, we used data from 1993 and 1994 to determine the apparent sensitivity, specificity, relative incidence rates, and PPVs for the 5 disorders. For biotinidase deficiency and CAH, we also calculated relative incidence rates and PPVs for 1991 and 1992.

Results: Our analyses revealed the following best estimates for the relative incidence rates of 5 disorders: phenylketonuria, 1:14,000; galactosemia, 1:59,000; biotinidase deficiency, 1:80,000; congenital hypothyroidism, 1:3,300; and CAH, 1:20,000. An apparent sensitivity of 100% has been reported by the various states for most of the disorders, and specificity levels are all above 99%. The PPVs, however, range from 0.5% to 6.0%. Consequently, on average, there are more than 50 false-positive results for every true-positive result identified through newborn screening in the United States.

Conclusions: The magnitude of false-positive results generated in newborn screening programs, particularly for congenital endocrinopathies, presents a great challenge for future improvement of this important public health program. Attention must be given to improved laboratory tests, use of more specific markers, and better risk communication for families of patients with false-positive test results.

Citing Articles

Estimating the sensitivity of genomic newborn screening for treatable inherited metabolic disorders.

Bick S, Nathan A, Park H, Green R, Wojcik M, Gold N Genet Med. 2024; 27(1):101284.

PMID: 39355980 PMC: 11717630. DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2024.101284.


Evaluation of a multiplex liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for congenital adrenal hyperplasia in pediatric patients.

Cao J, Sonilal M, Roper S, Ali M, Devaraj S Clin Mass Spectrom. 2024; 9:18-22.

PMID: 39193353 PMC: 11322746. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinms.2018.07.001.


The Multi-Omic Approach to Newborn Screening: Opportunities and Challenges.

Ashenden A, Chowdhury A, Anastasi L, Lam K, Rozek T, Ranieri E Int J Neonatal Screen. 2024; 10(3).

PMID: 39051398 PMC: 11270328. DOI: 10.3390/ijns10030042.


Past as Prologue: Predicting Potential Psychosocial-Ethical Burdens of Positive Newborn Screens as Conditions Propagate.

Bush L, Levy H Int J Neonatal Screen. 2024; 10(1).

PMID: 38390976 PMC: 10885124. DOI: 10.3390/ijns10010012.


Butyrylcarnitine Elevation in Newborn Screening: Reducing False Positives and Distinguishing between Two Rare Diseases through the Evaluation of New Ratios.

Messina M, Arena A, Iacobacci R, La Spina L, Meli C, Raudino F Biomedicines. 2023; 11(12).

PMID: 38137468 PMC: 10741594. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11123247.