» Articles » PMID: 37809616

Microplastics Contamination in Fish Feeds: Characterization and Potential Exposure Risk Assessment for Cultivated Fish of Bangladesh

Overview
Journal Heliyon
Specialty Social Sciences
Date 2023 Oct 9
PMID 37809616
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Fish feed is becoming an increasingly vital source of nourishment for farmed fish, which are mainly coming from marine fish and agricultural sources. Anthropogenic particles, such as microplastics, are abundant in both marine fish and agricultural byproducts that are utilized to make fish feed. This study investigated whether fish feed could be a source of microplastic contamination, and revealed that a 20 weeks adult farmed tilapia fish might consume up to 268.45 ± 1.438 microplastic particles via fish feed where finisher type feeds were found to be mostly contributory in this number. The microplastics were initially observed with a stereomicroscope and FESEM-EDS. Polymeric composition of microplastics was determined to be polypropylene (PP), nylon-6 (NY-6), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polystyrene (PS), polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), polyethylene (PE), high- and low-density polyethylene (HDPE, LDPE), ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA), polycarbonate (PC), poly vinyl acetate (PVAc), poly urethane (PU) and polyvinyl chloride (PVC) by FTIR. Results also revealed that the size of microplastic particles in all fish feed ranged from 14 μm to 4480 μm, with 550 ± 45.45 to 11,600 ± 56.1 microplastic particles/kg of fish feed. The FESEM-EDS data demonstrated to overlook the microplastic surface along with attachment of heavy metals onto that surface such as Pb, Ni, and Co in finisher type feed that could create additional health risks.

Citing Articles

Microplastic pollution in aquafeed of diverse aquaculture animals.

Mohsen M, Lin J, Lu K, Wang L, Zhang C Heliyon. 2024; 10(17):e37370.

PMID: 39296156 PMC: 11408773. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37370.

References
1.
Auta H, Emenike C, Fauziah S . Distribution and importance of microplastics in the marine environment: A review of the sources, fate, effects, and potential solutions. Environ Int. 2017; 102:165-176. DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2017.02.013. View

2.
Sathish M, Jeyasanta I, Patterson J . Microplastics in Salt of Tuticorin, Southeast Coast of India. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2020; 79(1):111-121. DOI: 10.1007/s00244-020-00731-0. View

3.
Tanaka K, Takada H . Microplastic fragments and microbeads in digestive tracts of planktivorous fish from urban coastal waters. Sci Rep. 2016; 6:34351. PMC: 5043373. DOI: 10.1038/srep34351. View

4.
Espinosa C, Esteban M, Cuesta A . Dietary administration of PVC and PE microplastics produces histological damage, oxidative stress and immunoregulation in European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax L.). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2019; 95:574-583. DOI: 10.1016/j.fsi.2019.10.072. View

5.
Parvin F, Jannat S, Tareq S . Abundance, characteristics and variation of microplastics in different freshwater fish species from Bangladesh. Sci Total Environ. 2021; 784:147137. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147137. View