» Articles » PMID: 37799901

Comparative Analysis of Bonding Strength Between Enamel and Overlay of Varying Thicknesses Following an Aging Test

Overview
Journal J Dent Sci
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2023 Oct 6
PMID 37799901
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Abstract: Overlay restorations can be used clinically as a treatment option to preserve natural dentine. However, whether the residual enamel thickness and overlay thickness affect the adhesion between the restoration and tooth is still unknown. This study was to investigate effects of the overlay thickness and residual enamel thickness on bonding strength.

Materials And Methods: Overlays of different thicknesses were prepared with natural teeth which had 2, 4, and 6 mm of occlusal reduction (n = 10). Specimens were subjected to 10,000 cycles in water at 5-55 °C, and finally compressive strength tests were used to evaluate the bonding strength.

Results: All groups showed good bond strength ( > 0.05). The overlay restorations of different thicknesses reduced the preparation amount by 30.3%-7.2% and significantly preserved more of the tooth structure ( < 0.005). Compared to the control group, the overlay restoration increased the marginal fitness by about 0.67-0.88 times. The thermal cycling indicated that the decrease in the maximum bearing stress was due to the aging of the ceramic itself. Therefore, the thickness of the overlay had a greater influence on the compressive strength than the bond strength.

Conclusion: Based on the above this study recommends an overlay thickness of at least 2 mm in clinical practice. The aging test confirmed that adhesion between the overlay and teeth was quite firm and stable. This shows that a stable adhesive effect of the overlay can be used as a treatment option for preserving a greater amount of a tooth's structure.

Citing Articles

Comparisons of precision and trueness of digital dental casts produced by desktop scanners and intraoral scanners.

Chuang C, Cheng F, Chen M, Lin W, Chiang C J Dent Sci. 2025; 20(1):137-146.

PMID: 39873032 PMC: 11763548. DOI: 10.1016/j.jds.2024.09.016.


The Influence of Dental Virtualization, Restoration Types, and Placement Angles on the Trueness and Contact Space in 3D-Printed Crowns: A Comprehensive Exploration.

Lu T, Lin W, Yang T, Sahrir C, Shen Y, Feng S Dent J (Basel). 2024; 12(1).

PMID: 38275677 PMC: 10814425. DOI: 10.3390/dj12010002.

References
1.
Trindade F, Kleverlaan C, da Silva L, Feilzer A, Cesar P, Bottino M . Ceramic Inlays: Effect of Mechanical Cycling and Ceramic Type on Restoration-dentin Bond Strength. Oper Dent. 2016; 41(4):E102-17. DOI: 10.2341/14-155-L. View

2.
Fornazari I, Wille I, Meda E, Brum R, Souza E . Effect of Surface Treatment, Silane, and Universal Adhesive on Microshear Bond Strength of Nanofilled Composite Repairs. Oper Dent. 2017; 42(4):367-374. DOI: 10.2341/16-259-L. View

3.
Silva E Souza Jr M, Carneiro K, Lobato M, de Almeida Rodrigues Silva E Souza P, Goes M . Adhesive systems: important aspects related to their composition and clinical use. J Appl Oral Sci. 2010; 18(3):207-14. PMC: 5349047. DOI: 10.1590/s1678-77572010000300002. View

4.
Dolev E, Bitterman Y, Meirowitz A . Comparison of marginal fit between CAD-CAM and hot-press lithium disilicate crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 2018; 121(1):124-128. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.03.035. View

5.
Vasconcelos Monteiro R, Dos Santos D, Bernardon J, De Souza G . Effect of surface treatment on the retention of zirconia crowns to tooth structure after aging. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2020; 32(7):699-706. DOI: 10.1111/jerd.12623. View