» Articles » PMID: 37798779

Effect of Predators on Anopheles Arabiensis and Anopheles Funestus Larval Survivorship in Homa Bay County Western Kenya

Overview
Journal Malar J
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Tropical Medicine
Date 2023 Oct 5
PMID 37798779
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The rise of insecticide resistance against malaria vectors in sub-Saharan Africa has resulted in the need to consider other methods of vector control. The potential use of biological methods, including larvivorous fish, Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis (Bti) and plant shading, is sustainable and environmentally friendly options. This study examined the survivorship of Anopheles arabiensis and Anopheles funestus larvae and habitat productivity in four permanent habitat types in Homa Bay county, western Kenya.

Methods: Predator densities were studied in a laboratory setup while habitat productivity and larval survivorship was studied in field setup.

Results: Fish were observed as the most efficient predator (75.8% larval reduction rate) followed by water boatman (69%), and dragonfly nymph (69.5%) in predation rates. Lower predation rates were observed in backswimmers (31%), water beetles (14.9%), water spiders (12.2%), mayflies (7.3%), and tadpoles (6.9%). Increase in predator density in the field setup resulted in decreased Culex larval density. Larval and pupa age-specific distribution was determined and their survivorship curves constructed. Combined larvae (Stage I-IV) to pupa mortality was over 97% for An. arabiensis and 100% for An. funestus. The highest larval stage survival rate was from larval stages I to II and the lowest from larval stage IV to pupa. Stage-specific life tables indicated high mortality rates at every developmental stage, especially at the larval stage II and III.

Conclusion: Determination of the efficiency of various larval predators and habitat productivity will help with the correct identification of productive habitats and selection of complementary vector control methods through environmental management and/or predator introduction (for instance fish) in the habitats.

Citing Articles

Anopheles arabiensis larval habitats characterization and Anopheles species diversity in water bodies from Jozini, KwaZulu-Natal Province.

Marubini E, Musekiwa A, Maposa I, Mazarire T, Sekgele W, Mabaso N Malar J. 2025; 24(1):52.

PMID: 39979987 PMC: 11844105. DOI: 10.1186/s12936-025-05287-9.

References
1.
Maharaj R, Kissoon S, Lakan V, Kheswa N . Rolling back malaria in Africa - challenges and opportunities to winning the elimination battle. S Afr Med J. 2020; 109(11b):53-56. DOI: 10.7196/SAMJ.2019.v109i11b.14250. View

2.
Amimo F, Lambert B, Magit A, Sacarlal J, Hashizume M, Shibuya K . resistance to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine in Africa: a systematic analysis of national trends. BMJ Glob Health. 2020; 5(11). PMC: 7678238. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003217. View

3.
Lai S, Sun J, Ruktanonchai N, Zhou S, Yu J, Routledge I . Changing epidemiology and challenges of malaria in China towards elimination. Malar J. 2019; 18(1):107. PMC: 6440015. DOI: 10.1186/s12936-019-2736-8. View

4.
Lindsay S, Thomas M, Kleinschmidt I . Threats to the effectiveness of insecticide-treated bednets for malaria control: thinking beyond insecticide resistance. Lancet Glob Health. 2021; 9(9):e1325-e1331. DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00216-3. View

5.
Zinszer K, Talisuna A . Fighting insecticide resistance in malaria control. Lancet Infect Dis. 2022; 23(2):138-139. DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00518-7. View