» Articles » PMID: 21729269

Predation Efficiency of Anopheles Gambiae Larvae by Aquatic Predators in Western Kenya Highlands

Overview
Journal Parasit Vectors
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2011 Jul 7
PMID 21729269
Citations 41
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The current status of insecticide resistance in mosquitoes and the effects of insecticides on non-target insect species have raised the need for alternative control methods for malaria vectors. Predation has been suggested as one of the important regulation mechanisms for malaria vectors in long-lasting aquatic habitats, but the predation efficiency of the potential predators is largely unknown in the highlands of western Kenya. In the current study, we examined the predation efficiency of five predators on Anopheles gambiae s.s larvae in 24 hour and semi- field evaluations.

Methods: Predators were collected from natural habitats and starved for 12 hours prior to starting experiments. Preliminary experiments were conducted to ascertain the larval stage most predated by each predator species. When each larval instar was subjected to predation, third instar larvae were predated at the highest rate. Third instar larvae of An. gambiae were introduced into artificial habitats with and without refugia at various larval densities. The numbers of surviving larvae were counted after 24 hours in 24. In semi-field experiments, the larvae were counted daily until they were all either consumed or had developed to the pupal stage. Polymerase chain reaction was used to confirm the presence of An. gambiae DNA in predator guts.

Results: Experiments found that habitat type (P < 0.0001) and predator species (P < 0.0001) had a significant impact on the predation rate in the 24 hour evaluations. In semi-field experiments, predator species (P < 0.0001) and habitat type (P < 0.0001) were significant factors in both the daily survival and the overall developmental time of larvae. Pupation rates took significantly longer in habitats with refugia. An. gambiae DNA was found in at least three out of ten midguts for all predator species. Gambusia affins was the most efficient, being three times more efficient than tadpoles.

Conclusion: These experiments provide insight into the efficiency of specific natural predators against mosquito larvae. These naturally occurring predators may be useful in biocontrol strategies for aquatic stage An. gambiae mosquitoes. Further investigations should be done in complex natural habitats for these predators.

Citing Articles

A systematic review of poeciliid fish invasions in Africa.

Pritchard Cairns J, de Braganca P, South J BMC Ecol Evol. 2024; 24(1):136.

PMID: 39506681 PMC: 11539733. DOI: 10.1186/s12862-024-02321-3.


Semi-field evaluation of aquatic predators for the control of Anopheles funestus in rural south-eastern Tanzania.

Mahenge H, Muyaga L, Nkya J, Kafwenji A, Mwalugelo Y, Kahamba N Malar J. 2024; 23(1):228.

PMID: 39090658 PMC: 11295350. DOI: 10.1186/s12936-024-05055-1.


A review of applications and limitations of using aquatic macroinvertebrate predators for biocontrol of the African malaria mosquito, Anopheles gambiae sensu lato.

Onen H, Kaddumukasa M, Kayondo J, Akol A, Tripet F Parasit Vectors. 2024; 17(1):257.

PMID: 38867296 PMC: 11170859. DOI: 10.1186/s13071-024-06332-3.


Sibling species of the major malaria vector Anopheles gambiae display divergent preferences for aquatic breeding sites in southern Nigeria.

Ebhodaghe F, Sanchez-Vargas I, Isaac C, Foy B, Hemming-Schroeder E Malar J. 2024; 23(1):60.

PMID: 38413961 PMC: 10900747. DOI: 10.1186/s12936-024-04871-9.


Relationships between water quality and mosquito presence and abundance: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Avramov M, Thaivalappil A, Ludwig A, Miner L, Cullingham C, Waddell L J Med Entomol. 2023; 61(1):1-33.

PMID: 37832159 PMC: 10784781. DOI: 10.1093/jme/tjad139.


References
1.
Blaustein L, Chase J . Interactions between mosquito larvae and species that share the same trophic level. Annu Rev Entomol. 2006; 52:489-507. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ento.52.110405.091431. View

2.
Kesavaraju B, Juliano S . Behavioral Responses of Aedes albopictus to a Predator Are Correlated with Size-Dependent Risk of Predation. Ann Entomol Soc Am. 2009; 101(6):1150-1153. PMC: 2659678. DOI: 10.1603/0013-8746-101.6.1150. View

3.
Raghavendra K, Sharma P, Dash A . Biological control of mosquito populations through frogs: opportunities & constrains. Indian J Med Res. 2008; 128(1):22-5. View

4.
Mwangangi J, Muturi E, Shililu J, Muriu S, Jacob B, Kabiru E . Contribution of different aquatic habitats to adult Anopheles arabiensis and Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae) production in a rice agroecosystem in Mwea, Kenya. J Vector Ecol. 2008; 33(1):129-38. DOI: 10.3376/1081-1710(2008)33[129:codaht]2.0.co;2. View

5.
Aditya G, Pramanik M, Saha G . Larval habitats and species composition of mosquitoes in Darjeeling Himalayas, India. J Vector Borne Dis. 2006; 43(1):7-15. View