Optimal Conspicuity of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma in Virtual Monochromatic Imaging Reconstructions on a Photon-counting Detector CT: Comparison to Conventional MDCT

Overview

Journal Abdom Radiol (NY)

Publisher Springer

Specialties Gastroenterology
Radiology

Date 2023 Oct 5

PMID 37796327

Authors

Josua A Decker

Judith Becker

Mark Harting

Bertram Jehs

Franka Risch

Luca Canalini

Claudia Wollny

Christian Scheurig-Muenkler

Thomas Kroencke

Florian Schwarz

Stefanie Bette

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: To analyze the conspicuity of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in virtual monoenergetic images (VMI) on a novel photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) in comparison to energy-integrating CT (EID-CT).

Methods: Inclusion criteria comprised initial diagnosis of PDAC (reference standard: histopathological analysis) and standardized contrast-enhanced CT imaging either on an EID-CT or a PCD-CT. Patients were excluded due to different histopathological diagnosis or missing tumor delineation on CT. On the PCD-CT, 40-190 keV VMI reconstructions were generated. Image noise, tumor-to-pancreas ratio (TPR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were analyzed by ROI-based measurements in arterial and portal venous contrast phase. Two board-certified radiologist evaluated image quality and tumor delineation at both, EID-CT and PCD-CT (40 and 70 keV).

Results: Thirty-eight patients (mean age 70.4 years ± 10.3 [range 45-91], 27 males; PCD-CT: n=19, EID-CT: n=19) were retrospectively included. On the PCD-CT, tumor conspicuity (reflected by low TPR and high CNR) was significantly improved at low-energy VMI series (≤ 70 keV compared to > 70 keV), both in arterial and in portal venous contrast phase (P < 0.001), reaching the maximum at 40 keV. Comparison between PCD-CT and EID-CT showed significantly higher CNR on the PCD-CT in portal venous contrast phase at < 70 keV (P < 0.016). On the PCD-CT, tumor conspicuity was improved in portal venous contrast phase compared to arterial contrast phase especially at the lower end of the VMI spectrum (≤ 70 keV). Qualitative analysis revealed that tumor delineation is improved in 40 keV reconstructions compared to 70 keV reconstructions on a PCD-CT.

Conclusion: PCD-CT VMI reconstructions (≤ 70 keV) showed significantly improved conspicuity of PDAC in quantitative and qualitative analysis in both, arterial and portal venous contrast phase, compared to EID-CT, which may be important for early detection of tumor tissue in clinical routine. Tumor delineation was superior in portal venous contrast phase compared to arterial contrast phase.

Citing Articles

Optimizing photon counting CT enterography: determining the optimal virtual monoenergy for bowel imaging.

Sharifi A, ODonnell T, Dane B Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025; .

PMID: 39934396 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-025-04832-z.

Optimal virtual monoenergy for the detection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma during the pancreatic parenchymal phase on photon counting CT.

Ruff A, Li X, Goldberg J, Ehrhart M, Ginocchio L, Smereka P Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025; .

PMID: 39775026 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04696-9.

An update on pancreatic cancer imaging, staging, and use of the PACT-UK radiology template pre- and post-neoadjuvant treatment.

Corallo C, Al-Adhami A, Jamieson N, Valle J, Radhakrishna G, Moir J Br J Radiol. 2024; 98(1165):13-26.

PMID: 39460945 PMC: 11652714. DOI: 10.1093/bjr/tqae217.

Performance of iodine quantification through high-pitch dual-source photon-counting CT: a phantom study.

Liu P, Zhou S, Dong H, Li J, Xu Z, Lin S Jpn J Radiol. 2024; 43(2):309-318.

PMID: 39382795 DOI: 10.1007/s11604-024-01671-8.

Photon-counting CT: technical features and clinical impact on abdominal imaging.

Onishi H, Tsuboyama T, Nakamoto A, Ota T, Fukui H, Tatsumi M Abdom Radiol (NY). 2024; 49(12):4383-4399.

PMID: 38888738 PMC: 11522066. DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04414-5.

References

Bette S, Braun F, Haerting M, Decker J, Luitjens J, Scheurig-Muenkler C . Visualization of bone details in a novel photon-counting dual-source CT scanner-comparison with energy-integrating CT. Eur Radiol. 2021; 32(5):2930-2936. PMC: 9038873. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-08441-4. View

Canto M, Hruban R, Fishman E, Kamel I, Schulick R, Zhang Z . Frequent detection of pancreatic lesions in asymptomatic high-risk individuals. Gastroenterology. 2012; 142(4):796-804. PMC: 3321068. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.01.005. View

Booij R, van der Werf N, Dijkshoorn M, van der Lugt A, van Straten M . Assessment of Iodine Contrast-To-Noise Ratio in Virtual Monoenergetic Images Reconstructed from Dual-Source Energy-Integrating CT and Photon-Counting CT Data. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022; 12(6). PMC: 9222007. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12061467. View

Dillinger D, Overhoff D, Booz C, Kaatsch H, Piechotka J, Hagen A . Impact of CT Photon-Counting Virtual Monoenergetic Imaging on Visualization of Abdominal Arterial Vessels. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(5). PMC: 10000913. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13050938. View

Fujisaki Y, Fukukura Y, Kumagae Y, Ejima F, Yamagishi R, Nakamura S . Value of Dual-Energy Computed Tomography for Detecting Small Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Pancreas. 2023; 51(10):1352-1358. DOI: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000002207. View

Noda Y, Goshima S, Kaga T, Ando T, Miyoshi T, Kawai N . Virtual monochromatic image at lower energy level for assessing pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in fast kV-switching dual-energy CT. Clin Radiol. 2019; 75(4):320.e17-320.e23. DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2019.11.012. View

Kauhanen S, Komar G, Seppanen M, Dean K, Minn H, Kajander S . A prospective diagnostic accuracy study of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography, multidetector row computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in primary diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg. 2009; 250(6):957-63. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b2fafa. View

Sahani D, Shah Z, Catalano O, Boland G, Brugge W . Radiology of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: current status of imaging. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008; 23(1):23-33. DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2007.05117.x. View

Legmann P, Vignaux O, Dousset B, Baraza A, Palazzo L, Dumontier I . Pancreatic tumors: comparison of dual-phase helical CT and endoscopic sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998; 170(5):1315-22. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.170.5.9574609. View

10.

Beer L, Toepker M, Ba-Ssalamah A, Schestak C, Dutschke A, Schindl M . Objective and subjective comparison of virtual monoenergetic vs. polychromatic images in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Eur Radiol. 2019; 29(7):3617-3625. PMC: 6554239. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-019-06116-9. View

11.

Willemink M, Persson M, Pourmorteza A, Pelc N, Fleischmann D . Photon-counting CT: Technical Principles and Clinical Prospects. Radiology. 2018; 289(2):293-312. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2018172656. View

12.

Singhi A, Koay E, Chari S, Maitra A . Early Detection of Pancreatic Cancer: Opportunities and Challenges. Gastroenterology. 2019; 156(7):2024-2040. PMC: 6486851. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.01.259. View

13.

Lu D, Vedantham S, Krasny R, Kadell B, BERGER W, Reber H . Two-phase helical CT for pancreatic tumors: pancreatic versus hepatic phase enhancement of tumor, pancreas, and vascular structures. Radiology. 1996; 199(3):697-701. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.199.3.8637990. View

14.

Nagayama Y, Tanoue S, Inoue T, Oda S, Nakaura T, Utsunomiya D . Dual-layer spectral CT improves image quality of multiphasic pancreas CT in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Eur Radiol. 2019; 30(1):394-403. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-019-06337-y. View

15.

Palazzo L, Roseau G, Gayet B, Vilgrain V, Belghiti J, Fekete F . Endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Results of a prospective study with comparison to ultrasonography and CT scan. Endoscopy. 1993; 25(2):143-50. DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-1010273. View

16.

Flohr T, Petersilka M, Henning A, Ulzheimer S, Ferda J, Schmidt B . Photon-counting CT review. Phys Med. 2020; 79:126-136. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.10.030. View

17.

DAngelo T, Cicero G, Mazziotti S, Ascenti G, Albrecht M, Martin S . Dual energy computed tomography virtual monoenergetic imaging: technique and clinical applications. Br J Radiol. 2019; 92(1098):20180546. PMC: 6592074. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20180546. View

18.

Hanson G, Michalak G, Childs R, McCollough B, Kurup A, Hough D . Low kV versus dual-energy virtual monoenergetic CT imaging for proven liver lesions: what are the advantages and trade-offs in conspicuity and image quality? A pilot study. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2017; 43(6):1404-1412. PMC: 5886842. DOI: 10.1007/s00261-017-1327-9. View

19.

Fletcher J, Wiersema M, Farrell M, Fidler J, Burgart L, Koyama T . Pancreatic malignancy: value of arterial, pancreatic, and hepatic phase imaging with multi-detector row CT. Radiology. 2003; 229(1):81-90. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2291020582. View

20.

Decker J, Bette S, Lubina N, Rippel K, Braun F, Risch F . Low-dose CT of the abdomen: Initial experience on a novel photon-counting detector CT and comparison with energy-integrating detector CT. Eur J Radiol. 2022; 148:110181. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110181. View