Objective and Subjective Comparison of Virtual Monoenergetic Vs. Polychromatic Images in Patients with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Overview

Journal Eur Radiol

Specialty Radiology

Date 2019 Mar 20

PMID 30888484

Citations 27

Authors

Lucian Beer

Michael Toepker

Ahmed Ba-Ssalamah

Christian Schestak

Anja Dutschke

Martin Schindl

Alexander Wressnegger

Helmut Ringl

Paul Apfaltrer

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the objective and subjective image characteristics of monoenergetic images (MEI[+]), using a noise-optimized algorithm at different kiloelectron volts (keV) compared to polyenergetic images (PEI), in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

Methods: This retrospective, institutional review board-approved study included 45 patients (18 male, 27 female; mean age 66 years; range, 42-96 years) with PDAC who had undergone a dual-energy CT (DECT) of the abdomen for staging. One standard polyenergetic image (PEI) and five MEI(+) images in 10-keV intervals, ranging from 40 to 80 keV, were reconstructed. Line-density profile analysis, as well as the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the tumor, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the regular pancreas parenchyma and the tumor, and the CNR of the three main peripancreatic vessels, was calculated. For subjective quality assessment, two readers independently assessed the images using a 5-point Likert scale. Reader reliability was evaluated using an intraclass correlation coefficient.

Results: Line-density profile analysis revealed the largest gradient in attenuation between PDAC and regular tissue in MEI(+) at 40 keV. Low-keV MEI(+)reconstructions at 40 and 50 keV increased CNR and SNR compared to PEI (40 keV: CNR 46.8 vs. 7.5; SNR 32.5 vs. 15.7; SNR 13.5 vs. 8.6; p < 0.001). MEI(+) at 40 keV and 50 keV were consistently preferred by the observers (p < 0.05), showing a high intra-observer 0.937 (0.92-0.95) and inter-observer 0.911 (0.89-0.93) agreement.

Conclusion: MEI(+) reconstructions at 40 keV and 50 keV provide better objective and subjective image quality compared to conventional PEI of DECT in patients with PDAC.

Key Points: • Low-keV MEI(+) reconstructions at 40 and 50 keV increase tumor-to-pancreas contrast compared to PEI. • Low-keV MEI(+) reconstructions improve objective and subjective image quality parameters compared to PEI. • Dual-energy post-processing might be a valuable tool in the diagnostic workup of patients with PDAC.

Citing Articles

Reduced-dose CT scan of colorectal cancer.

Li S, Yang X, Cao Y, Yuan L, Lu T, Wang Y Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025; .

PMID: 39794537 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04660-7.

Optimal virtual monoenergy for the detection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma during the pancreatic parenchymal phase on photon counting CT.

Ruff A, Li X, Goldberg J, Ehrhart M, Ginocchio L, Smereka P Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025; .

PMID: 39775026 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04696-9.

An update on pancreatic cancer imaging, staging, and use of the PACT-UK radiology template pre- and post-neoadjuvant treatment.

Corallo C, Al-Adhami A, Jamieson N, Valle J, Radhakrishna G, Moir J Br J Radiol. 2024; 98(1165):13-26.

PMID: 39460945 PMC: 11652714. DOI: 10.1093/bjr/tqae217.

Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Dual-Energy Computed Tomography in the Pancreatic Parenchymal and Delayed Phases for Pancreatic Cancer.

Kurita Y, Utsunomiya D, Kubota K, Koyama S, Hasegawa S, Hosono K Tomography. 2024; 10(10):1591-1604.

PMID: 39453034 PMC: 11510840. DOI: 10.3390/tomography10100117.

Photon-counting detector computed tomography: iodine density versus virtual monoenergetic imaging of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Alagic Z, Duran C, Suzuki C, Halldorsson K, Svensson-Marcial A, Saeter R Abdom Radiol (NY). 2024; .

PMID: 39400586 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04605-0.

References

Jeon S, Lee J, Joo I, Lee D, Ahn S, Woo H . Magnetic resonance with diffusion-weighted imaging improves assessment of focal liver lesions in patients with potentially resectable pancreatic cancer on CT. Eur Radiol. 2018; 28(8):3484-3493. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-017-5258-1. View

Rassouli N, Chalian H, Rajiah P, Dhanantwari A, Landeras L . Assessment of 70-keV virtual monoenergetic spectral images in abdominal CT imaging: A comparison study to conventional polychromatic 120-kVp images. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2017; 42(10):2579-2586. DOI: 10.1007/s00261-017-1151-2. View

Muenzel D, Lo G, Yu H, Parakh A, Patino M, Kambadakone A . Material density iodine images in dual-energy CT: Detection and characterization of hypervascular liver lesions compared to magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Radiol. 2017; 95:300-306. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.08.035. View

Zhao L, Li F, Zhang Z, Zhang Z, Jiang Y, Wang X . Assessment of an advanced virtual monoenergetic reconstruction technique in cerebral and cervical angiography with third-generation dual-source CT: Feasibility of using low-concentration contrast medium. Eur Radiol. 2018; 28(10):4379-4388. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-018-5407-1. View

Grant K, Flohr T, Krauss B, Sedlmair M, Thomas C, Schmidt B . Assessment of an advanced image-based technique to calculate virtual monoenergetic computed tomographic images from a dual-energy examination to improve contrast-to-noise ratio in examinations using iodinated contrast media. Invest Radiol. 2014; 49(9):586-92. DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000060. View

McNamara M, Little M, Alexander L, Carroll L, Beasley T, Morgan D . Multireader evaluation of lesion conspicuity in small pancreatic adenocarcinomas: complimentary value of iodine material density and low keV simulated monoenergetic images using multiphasic rapid kVp-switching dual energy CT. Abdom Imaging. 2014; 40(5):1230-40. DOI: 10.1007/s00261-014-0274-y. View

De Cecco C, Caruso D, Schoepf U, De Santis D, Muscogiuri G, Albrecht M . A noise-optimized virtual monoenergetic reconstruction algorithm improves the diagnostic accuracy of late hepatic arterial phase dual-energy CT for the detection of hypervascular liver lesions. Eur Radiol. 2018; 28(8):3393-3404. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-018-5313-6. View

Euler A, Obmann M, Szucs-Farkas Z, Mileto A, Zaehringer C, Falkowski A . Comparison of image quality and radiation dose between split-filter dual-energy images and single-energy images in single-source abdominal CT. Eur Radiol. 2018; 28(8):3405-3412. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-018-5338-x. View

Somers I, Bipat S . Contrast-enhanced CT in determining resectability in patients with pancreatic carcinoma: a meta-analysis of the positive predictive values of CT. Eur Radiol. 2017; 27(8):3408-3435. PMC: 5491588. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-016-4708-5. View

10.

May M, Wiesmueller M, Heiss R, Brand M, Bruegel J, Uder M . Comparison of dual- and single-source dual-energy CT in head and neck imaging. Eur Radiol. 2018; 29(8):4207-4214. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-018-5762-y. View

11.

Sudarski S, Apfaltrer P, Nance Jr J, Schneider D, Meyer M, Schoenberg S . Optimization of keV-settings in abdominal and lower extremity dual-source dual-energy CT angiography determined with virtual monoenergetic imaging. Eur J Radiol. 2013; 82(10):e574-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.04.040. View

12.

George E, Wortman J, Fulwadhva U, Uyeda J, Sodickson A . Dual energy CT applications in pancreatic pathologies. Br J Radiol. 2017; 90(1080):20170411. PMC: 6047640. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20170411. View

13.

Parakh A, Patino M, Muenzel D, Kambadakone A, Sahani D . Role of rapid kV-switching dual-energy CT in assessment of post-surgical local recurrence of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2017; 43(2):497-504. DOI: 10.1007/s00261-017-1390-2. View

14.

Bellini D, Gupta S, Ramirez-Giraldo J, Fu W, Stinnett S, Patel B . Use of a Noise Optimized Monoenergetic Algorithm for Patient-Size Independent Selection of an Optimal Energy Level During Dual-Energy CT of the Pancreas. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2016; 41(1):39-47. DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000492. View

15.

Toepker M, Czerny C, Ringl H, Fruehwald-Pallamar J, Wolf F, Weber M . Can dual-energy CT improve the assessment of tumor margins in oral cancer?. Oral Oncol. 2013; 50(3):221-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2013.12.001. View

16.

Koelblinger C, Ba-Ssalamah A, Goetzinger P, Puchner S, Weber M, Sahora K . Gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced 3.0-T MR imaging versus multiphasic 64-detector row CT: prospective evaluation in patients suspected of having pancreatic cancer. Radiology. 2011; 259(3):757-66. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.11101189. View

17.

Gordic S, Puippe G, Krauss B, Klotz E, Desbiolles L, Lesurtel M . Correlation between Dual-Energy and Perfusion CT in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Radiology. 2016; 280(1):78-87. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2015151560. View

18.

Kordbacheh H, Baliyan V, Singh P, Eisner B, Sahani D, Kambadakone A . Rapid kVp switching dual-energy CT in the assessment of urolithiasis in patients with large body habitus: preliminary observations on image quality and stone characterization. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2018; 44(3):1019-1026. DOI: 10.1007/s00261-018-1808-5. View

19.

Arvold N, Niemierko A, Mamon H, Fernandez-Del Castillo C, Hong T . Pancreatic cancer tumor size on CT scan versus pathologic specimen: implications for radiation treatment planning. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010; 80(5):1383-90. PMC: 4362517. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.04.058. View

20.

Nagayama Y, Iyama A, Oda S, Taguchi N, Nakaura T, Utsunomiya D . Dual-layer dual-energy computed tomography for the assessment of hypovascular hepatic metastases: impact of closing k-edge on image quality and lesion detectability. Eur Radiol. 2018; 29(6):2837-2847. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-018-5789-0. View