» Articles » PMID: 37780558

Risk Prediction Models for Postoperative Delirium in Elderly Patients with Hip Fracture: a Systematic Review

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2023 Oct 2
PMID 37780558
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To systematically evaluate the risk prediction models for postoperative delirium in older adult hip fracture patients.

Methods: Risk prediction models for postoperative delirium in older adult hip fracture patients were collected from the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, and Ovid via the internet, covering studies from the establishment of the databases to March 15, 2023. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and used Stata 13.0 for meta-analysis of predictive factors and the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST) to evaluate the risk prediction models for postoperative delirium in older adult hip fracture patients, evaluated the predictive performance.

Results: This analysis included eight studies. Six studies used internal validation to assess the predictive models, while one combined both internal and external validation. The Area Under Curve (AUC) for the models ranged from 0.67 to 0.79. The most common predictors were preoperative dementia or dementia history (OR = 3.123, 95% CI 2.108-4.626,  < 0.001), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification (OR = 2.343, 95% CI 1.146-4.789,  < 0.05), and age (OR = 1.615, 95% CI 1.387-1.880,  < 0.001). This meta-analysis shows that these were independent risk factors for postoperative delirium in older adult patients with hip fracture.

Conclusion: Research on the risk prediction models for postoperative delirium in older adult hip fracture patients is still in the developmental stage. The predictive performance of some of the established models achieve expectation and the applicable risk of all models is low, but there are also problems such as high risk of bias and lack of external validation. Medical professionals should select existing models and validate and optimize them with large samples from multiple centers according to their actual situation. It is more recommended to carry out a large sample of prospective studies to build prediction models.

Systematic Review Registration: The protocol for this systematic review was published in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) under the registered number CRD42022365258.

Citing Articles

Random forest predictive modeling of prolonged hospital length of stay in elderly hip fracture patients.

Liu H, Xing F, Jiang J, Chen Z, Xiang Z, Duan X Front Med (Lausanne). 2024; 11:1362153.

PMID: 38828234 PMC: 11140010. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1362153.

References
1.
Wolff R, Moons K, Riley R, Whiting P, Westwood M, Collins G . PROBAST: A Tool to Assess the Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies. Ann Intern Med. 2019; 170(1):51-58. DOI: 10.7326/M18-1376. View

2.
Rong X, Ding Z, Yu H, Yao S, Zhou Z . Risk factors of postoperative delirium in the knee and hip replacement patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021; 16(1):76. PMC: 7821501. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-020-02127-1. View

3.
Akyol S, Yilmaz A, Oh K, Ugur Z, Aydas B, McGuinness B . Evidence that the Kennedy and polyamine pathways are dysregulated in human brain in cases of dementia with Lewy bodies. Brain Res. 2020; 1743:146897. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2020.146897. View

4.
Cooper C, Cole Z, Holroyd C, Earl S, Harvey N, Dennison E . Secular trends in the incidence of hip and other osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2011; 22(5):1277-88. PMC: 3546313. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-011-1601-6. View

5.
van den Brom R, van Es S, Leliveld A, Gietema J, Hospers G, de Jong I . Balancing treatment efficacy, toxicity and complication risk in elderly patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Treat Rev. 2016; 46:63-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2016.04.002. View