» Articles » PMID: 37777463

Naturalistic Reinforcement Learning

Overview
Journal Trends Cogn Sci
Date 2023 Sep 30
PMID 37777463
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Humans possess a remarkable ability to make decisions within real-world environments that are expansive, complex, and multidimensional. Human cognitive computational neuroscience has sought to exploit reinforcement learning (RL) as a framework within which to explain human decision-making, often focusing on constrained, artificial experimental tasks. In this article, we review recent efforts that use naturalistic approaches to determine how humans make decisions in complex environments that better approximate the real world, providing a clearer picture of how humans navigate the challenges posed by real-world decisions. These studies purposely embed elements of naturalistic complexity within experimental paradigms, rather than focusing on simplification, generating insights into the processes that likely underpin humans' ability to navigate complex, multidimensional real-world environments so successfully.

Citing Articles

Approach-avoidance conflict recruits lateral frontoparietal and cinguloinsular networks in a predator-prey game setting.

Ni Y, Potter R, James T Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2025; .

PMID: 40011405 DOI: 10.3758/s13415-025-01278-0.


When to stop social learning from a predecessor in an information-foraging task.

Suganuma H, Naito A, Katahira K, Kameda T Evol Hum Sci. 2025; 7:e2.

PMID: 39935447 PMC: 11810515. DOI: 10.1017/ehs.2024.29.


Schemas, reinforcement learning and the medial prefrontal cortex.

Bein O, Niv Y Nat Rev Neurosci. 2025; 26(3):141-157.

PMID: 39775183 DOI: 10.1038/s41583-024-00893-z.


Association between SOFA score and risk of acute kidney injury in patients with diabetic ketoacidosis: an analysis of the MIMIC-IV database.

Hua Y, Ding N, Jing H, Xie Y, Wu H, Wu Y Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025; 15:1462330.

PMID: 39764255 PMC: 11700799. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1462330.


Medical Education: Considerations for a Successful Integration of Learning with and Learning about AI.

Domros-Zoungrana D, Rajaeean N, Boie S, Froling E, Lenz C J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2024; 11:23821205241284719.

PMID: 39654541 PMC: 11626671. DOI: 10.1177/23821205241284719.

References
1.
Wimmer G, Poldrack R . Reward learning and working memory: Effects of massed versus spaced training and post-learning delay period. Mem Cognit. 2021; 50(2):312-324. PMC: 8821056. DOI: 10.3758/s13421-021-01233-7. View

2.
Keren H, Zheng C, Jangraw D, Chang K, Vitale A, Rutledge R . The temporal representation of experience in subjective mood. Elife. 2021; 10. PMC: 8241441. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.62051. View

3.
Li C, Aivar M, Tong M, Hayhoe M . Memory shapes visual search strategies in large-scale environments. Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1):4324. PMC: 5847537. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-22731-w. View

4.
Wu C, Schulz E, Speekenbrink M, Nelson J, Meder B . Generalization guides human exploration in vast decision spaces. Nat Hum Behav. 2019; 2(12):915-924. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-018-0467-4. View

5.
Eckstein M, Master S, Xia L, Dahl R, Wilbrecht L, Collins A . The interpretation of computational model parameters depends on the context. Elife. 2022; 11. PMC: 9635876. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.75474. View