» Articles » PMID: 37755480

Increased Accuracy in Component Positioning Using an Image-less Robotic Arm System in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: a Retrospective Study

Overview
Date 2023 Sep 27
PMID 37755480
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RTKA) and navigated total knee arthroplasty (NTKA) have shown improved knee alignment and reduced radiographic outliers. Recent studies have proven that conventional mechanical alignment may not be the optimal goal for every patient. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of the planned implant positioning of a novel image-less robotic technique with an established navigated technique (NTKA).

Method: The study is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data that compared the implant positioning and lower-limb alignment of 86 image-less RTKA with 86 image-less NTKA. Radiographic analysis was performed to evaluate the lower-limb overall alignment, femoral and tibial components positioning in the coronal and sagittal planes. Outliers were evaluated with a cutoff of ± 3°.

Results: No difference was noted between the two groups for radiographic outliers within ± 3° from neutral (p = 0.098). The mean hip-knee-ankle angle deviation from target was 1.3° in the RTKA group compared to 1.9° in the NTKA (p < 0.001). Femoral sagittal deviation (femoral component flexion) was smaller in the RTKA group (0.9° vs 1.9°; p < 0.001). Similarly, tibial coronal deviation (0.8° vs 1.5°; p < 0.001) and tibial sagittal deviation (tibial slope) were smaller in the RTKA group compared to the NTKA group (0.9° vs 1.7°; p < 0.001).

Conclusions: The RTKA group reported a substantial and significant reduced error from the planned target angles for both tibial and femoral components. No difference in terms of radiographic outliers was noted between navigation and robotic assistance.

Citing Articles

Comparison between robotic-assisted and navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty shows comparable outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Melinte M, Simionescu L, Tabacar M, Blanaru V, Melinte R J Orthop. 2025; 68:96-104.

PMID: 40041811 PMC: 11875737. DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2025.01.039.


Does robotic surgical assistant (ROSA) functionally aligned TKA lead to higher satisfaction than conventional mechanically aligned TKA: A propensity-matched pair analysis.

Zhang E, Yeo W, Liu E, Chen J, Pang H, Yeo S J Orthop. 2024; 63:93-97.

PMID: 39564082 PMC: 11570743. DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.10.039.


Robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty outperforms manual technique in obese and overweight patients: a prospective comparative study.

Yu C, Zhang Z, Liu C, Huang Z, Lu X, Gao Y J Orthop Surg Res. 2024; 19(1):639.

PMID: 39380017 PMC: 11463081. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-05117-9.


Enhancing total knee arthroplasty outcomes: the role of individualized femoral sagittal alignment in robotic-assisted surgery - A randomized controlled trial.

Wang D, Ye Y, Liang X, Li K, Huang W J Orthop Surg Res. 2024; 19(1):558.

PMID: 39261881 PMC: 11389516. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-05027-w.


Robotic surgery: bibliometric analysis, continental distribution, and co-words analysis from 2001 to 2023.

Abdelwahab S, Taha M, Farasani A, Jerah A, Abdullah S, Aljahdali I J Robot Surg. 2024; 18(1):335.

PMID: 39237832 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-02091-6.


References
1.
Bourne R, Chesworth B, Davis A, Mahomed N, Charron K . Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not?. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009; 468(1):57-63. PMC: 2795819. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-009-1119-9. View

2.
Gunaratne R, Pratt D, Banda J, Fick D, Khan R, Robertson B . Patient Dissatisfaction Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review of the Literature. J Arthroplasty. 2017; 32(12):3854-3860. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.07.021. View

3.
Noble P, Conditt M, Cook K, Mathis K . The John Insall Award: Patient expectations affect satisfaction with total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006; 452:35-43. DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000238825.63648.1e. View

4.
Allen C, Hooper G, Oram B, Wells J . Does computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty improve the overall component position and patient function?. Int Orthop. 2013; 38(2):251-7. PMC: 3923953. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-013-1996-0. View

5.
Mancino F, Cacciola G, Malahias M, De Filippis R, De Marco D, Di Matteo V . What are the benefits of robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty over conventional manual total knee arthroplasty? A systematic review of comparative studies. Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2020; 12(Suppl 1):8657. PMC: 7459388. DOI: 10.4081/or.2020.8657. View