» Articles » PMID: 22669549

Robotic-assisted TKA Reduces Postoperative Alignment Outliers and Improves Gap Balance Compared to Conventional TKA

Overview
Publisher Wolters Kluwer
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2012 Jun 7
PMID 22669549
Citations 162
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Several studies have shown mechanical alignment influences the outcome of TKA. Robotic systems have been developed to improve the precision and accuracy of achieving component position and mechanical alignment.

Questions/purposes: We determined whether robotic-assisted implantation for TKA (1) improved clinical outcome; (2) improved mechanical axis alignment and implant inclination in the coronal and sagittal planes; (3) improved the balance (flexion and extension gaps); and (4) reduced complications, postoperative drainage, and operative time when compared to conventionally implanted TKA over an intermediate-term (minimum 3-year) followup period.

Methods: We prospectively randomized 100 patients who underwent unilateral TKA into one of two groups: 50 using a robotic-assisted procedure and 50 using conventional manual techniques. Outcome variables considered were postoperative ROM, WOMAC scores, Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) knee scores, mechanical axis alignment, flexion/extension gap balance, complications, postoperative drainage, and operative time. Minimum followup was 41 months (mean, 65 months; range, 41-81 months).

Results: There were no differences in postoperative ROM, WOMAC scores, and HSS knee scores. The robotic-assisted group resulted in no mechanical axis outliers (> ± 3° from neutral) compared to 24% in the conventional group. There were fewer robotic-assisted knees where the flexion gap exceeded the extension gap by 2 mm. The robotic-assisted procedures took an average of 25 minutes longer than the conventional procedures but had less postoperative blood drainage. There were no differences in complications between groups.

Conclusions: Robotic-assisted TKA appears to reduce the number of mechanical axis alignment outliers and improve the ability to achieve flexion-extension gap balance, without any differences in clinical scores or complications when compared to conventional manual techniques.

Citing Articles

Robotic total knee arthroplasty for moderate to high-grade valgus knee deformity: technique and outcomes.

Kalyan K, Singh A, Kumar P, Gundalli A, Mane S, Swarnkar H SICOT J. 2025; 11:12.

PMID: 40035462 PMC: 11878094. DOI: 10.1051/sicotj/2025005.


The utility of robotic-assisted surgery in total knee arthroplasty for moderate and severe valgus deformities: a case series.

Ang C, Ganthel K, Ho J, Devi K, Cheong J J Orthop Surg Res. 2025; 20(1):145.

PMID: 39920761 PMC: 11803977. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-05443-y.


Can robotic arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty be applied to valgus deformity.

Pierre-Henri V, Vincent G, Bertrand B, Frederic F, Thomas N, Remi P Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2025; 145(1):137.

PMID: 39849167 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-025-05756-5.


Characteristics of Resection Parameters in Robot-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty With the Ligament Balancing Workflow.

Wei Q, An H, Gu W, Sun W, Li R, Chai W Orthop Surg. 2025; 17(3):841-847.

PMID: 39846233 PMC: 11872359. DOI: 10.1111/os.14336.


Robotic assisted TKA may allow for smaller polyethylene liner sizes compared to manual TKA with simultaneous removal of Hardware.

Lachance A, Edelstein A, Shahsavarani S, Steika R, Stilwell M, Lutton J Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):2590.

PMID: 39833324 PMC: 11747172. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-87312-0.


References
1.
Rand J, COVENTRY M . Ten-year evaluation of geometric total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988; (232):168-73. View

2.
Sugama R, Kadoya Y, Kobayashi A, Takaoka K . Preparation of the flexion gap affects the extension gap in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2005; 20(5):602-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2003.12.085. View

3.
Takahashi T, Wada Y, Yamamoto H . Soft-tissue balancing with pressure distribution during total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997; 79(2):235-9. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.79b2.6743. View

4.
Longstaff L, Sloan K, Stamp N, Scaddan M, Beaver R . Good alignment after total knee arthroplasty leads to faster rehabilitation and better function. J Arthroplasty. 2008; 24(4):570-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.03.002. View

5.
Wasielewski R, Galante J, Leighty R, Natarajan R, Rosenberg A . Wear patterns on retrieved polyethylene tibial inserts and their relationship to technical considerations during total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994; (299):31-43. View